Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24933704›Full record

ReviewStem cell research2014

The epicardium signals the way towards heart regeneration.

Megan Masters, Paul R Riley

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Stem cell research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 105 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. RNA-Binding Protein Trim71 Controls Epicardial Cell Migration.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. LncRNAs in theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  12. Epicardial EMT and cardiac repair: an update.Stem cell research & therapy · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Megan MastersDepartment of Physiology Anatomy and Genetics, Sherrington Building, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PT, UK. Electronic address: megan.masters@dpag.ox.ac.uk.
Paul R RileyDepartment of Physiology Anatomy and Genetics, Sherrington Building, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PT, UK. Electronic address: paul.riley@dpag.ox.ac.uk.
University of Oxford · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation RG/13/9/30269
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

From historical studies of developing chick hearts to recent advances in regenerative injury models, the epicardium has arisen as a key player in heart genesis and repair. The epicardium provides paracrine signals to nurture growth of the developing heart from mid-gestation, and epicardium-derived cells act as progenitors of numerous cardiac cell types. Interference with either process is terminal for heart development and embryogenesis. In adulthood, the dormant epicardium reinstates an embryonic gene programme in response to injury. Furthermore, injury-induced epicardial signalling is essential for heart regeneration in zebrafish. Given these critical roles in development, injury response and heart regeneration, the application of epicardial signals following adult heart injury could offer therapeutic strategies for the treatment of ischaemic heart disease and heart failure.

Indexed as

Signal TransductionAnimalsHeartHumansMyocardial IschemiaPericardiumRegeneration

Identifiers

PMID24933704
PMCPMC4241487
OpenAlexW2060009170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.