ArticleBehavioral neuroscience2014
Contrasting networks for recognition memory and recency memory revealed by immediate-early gene imaging in the rat.
Article in Behavioral neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Brain Networks Differ According to Levels of Interference in Spatiotemporal Processing.Hippocampus · 2025Article
- A preserved neural code for temporal order between memory formation and recall in the human medial temporal lobe.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Inhibitory temporo-parietal effective connectivity is associated with explicit memory performance in older adults.iScience · 2023Article
- The medial prefrontal cortex - hippocampus circuit that integrates information of object, place and time to construct episodic memory in rodents: Behavioral, anatomical and neurochemical properties.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2020Review
- The memory for time and space differentially engages the proximal and distal parts of the hippocampal subfields CA1 and CA3.PLoS biology · 2018Article
- The retrosplenial cortex and object recency memory in the rat.The European journal of neuroscience · 2017Article
- Medial temporal pathways for contextual learning: Network c-Brain and neuroscience advances · 2017Article
- Detecting and discriminating novel objects: The impact of perirhinal cortex disconnection on hippocampal activity patterns.Hippocampus · 2016Article
- Perirhinal cortex lesions impair tests of object recognition memory but spare novelty detection.The European journal of neuroscience · 2015Article
- Advances in the behavioural testing and network imaging of rodent recognition memory.Behavioural brain research · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The expression of the immediate-early gene c-fos was used to compare networks of activity associated with recency memory (temporal order memory) and recognition memory. In Experiment 1, rats were first familiarized with sets of objects and then given pairs of different, familiar objects to explore. For the recency test group, each object in a pair was separated by 110 min in the time between their previous presentations. For the recency control test, each object in a pair was separated by less than a 1 min between their prior presentations. Temporal discrimination of the objects correlated with c-fos activity in the recency test group in several sites, including area Te2, the perirhinal cortex, lateral entorhinal cortex, as well as the dentate gyrus, hippocampal fields CA3 and CA1. For both the test and control conditions, network models were derived using structural equation modeling. The recency test model emphasized serial connections from the perirhinal cortex to lateral entorhinal cortex and then to the CA1 subfield. The recency control condition involved more parallel pathways, but again highlighted CA1 within the hippocampus. Both models contrasted with those derived from tests of object recognition (Experiment 2), because stimulus novelty was associated with pathways from the perirhinal cortex to lateral entorhinal cortex that then involved both the dentate gyrus (and CA3) and CA1 in parallel. The present findings implicate CA1 for the processing of familiar stimuli, including recency discriminations, while the dentate gyrus and CA3 pathways are recruited when the perirhinal cortex signals novel stimuli.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.