Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24933424›Full record

ArticleLaboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology2014

The tissue is the issue: improved methylome analysis from paraffin-embedded tissues by application of the HOPE technique.

Sebastian Marwitz, Julia Kolarova, Martin Reck, Niels Reinmuth, Christian Kugler, Ines Schädlich, Andrea Haake, Peter Zabel, Ekkehard Vollmer, Reiner Siebert and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. From fix to fit into the autoptic human brains.European journal of histochemistry : EJH · 2018
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Sebastian Marwitz1] Clinical and Experimental Pathology, Research Center Borstel, Borstel, Germany [2] Airway Research Center North (ARCN), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Grosshansdorf, Germany.
Julia KolarovaInstitute of Human Genetics, Christian-Albrechts-University Kiel and University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.
Martin Reck1] Airway Research Center North (ARCN), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Grosshansdorf, Germany [2] LungenClinic Grosshansdorf, Grosshansdorf, Germany.
Niels Reinmuth1] Airway Research Center North (ARCN), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Grosshansdorf, Germany [2] LungenClinic Grosshansdorf, Grosshansdorf, Germany.
Christian Kugler1] Airway Research Center North (ARCN), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Grosshansdorf, Germany [2] LungenClinic Grosshansdorf, Grosshansdorf, Germany.
Ines SchädlichInstitute of Human Genetics, Christian-Albrechts-University Kiel and University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.
Andrea HaakeInstitute of Human Genetics, Christian-Albrechts-University Kiel and University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.
Peter Zabel1] Airway Research Center North (ARCN), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Grosshansdorf, Germany [2] Medical Clinic, Research Center Borstel, Borstel, Germany.
Ekkehard Vollmer1] Clinical and Experimental Pathology, Research Center Borstel, Borstel, Germany [2] Airway Research Center North (ARCN), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Grosshansdorf, Germany.
Reiner Siebert1] Airway Research Center North (ARCN), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Grosshansdorf, Germany [2] Institute of Human Genetics, Christian-Albrechts-University Kiel and University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.
Torsten Goldmann1] Clinical and Experimental Pathology, Research Center Borstel, Borstel, Germany [2] Airway Research Center North (ARCN), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Grosshansdorf, Germany.
Ole Ammerpohl1] Airway Research Center North (ARCN), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Grosshansdorf, Germany [2] Institute of Human Genetics, Christian-Albrechts-University Kiel and University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.
Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel · DEGerman Center for Lung Research · DEResearch Center Borstel - Leibniz Lung Center · DEUniversity of Lübeck · DELungenClinic Grosshansdorf · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alterations in the DNA methylome are characteristic for numerous diseases and a typical hallmark of cancer. Therefore, DNA methylation is currently under investigation in research labs and has also entered diagnostics. Recently, protocols like the BeadChip technology have become commercially available to study DNA methylation in an array format and semiquantitative fashion. However, it is known that fixation of the sample material with formalin prior to BeadChip analysis can affect the results. In this study we compared the influence of fixation on the outcome of BeadChip analysis. From six patients each a lung cancer tissue sample and a corresponding tumor-free lung tissue sample were collected. The samples were separated into three pieces. One piece of each sample was fixed with formalin, another one by the non-cross-linking HOPE technique (Hepes-glutamic acid buffer mediated Organic solvent Protection Effect). Subsequently, both became paraffin embedded. As a reference, the remaining third piece was cryopreserved. In addition we used three adenocarcinoma cell lines (H838, A549, and H1650) to validate the results from patient tissues. We show that using the HOPE technique instead of formalin largely prevents the introduction of formalin-fixation related artifacts. An ANOVA analysis significantly separated HOPE- and cryopreserved from formalin-fixed samples (FDR<0.05), while differences in the methylation data obtained from HOPE-fixed and cryopreserved material were minor. Consequently, HOPE fixation is superior to formalin fixation if a subsequent BeadChip analysis of paraffin-embedded sample material is intended.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationTissue PreservationAdenocarcinomaAgedArtifactsBuffersCarcinoma, AdenosquamousCarcinoma, Large CellCarcinoma, Squamous CellCell Line, TumorCryopreservationDNA, NeoplasmFemaleGlutamic AcidHEPESHumansBuffersDNA, NeoplasmGlutamic AcidHEPES

Identifiers

PMID24933424
OpenAlexW2048791025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.