ArticleJournal of women's health (2002)2014
Effect of stress echocardiography testing on changes in cardiovascular risk behaviors in postmenopausal women: a prospective survey study.
Article in Journal of women's health (2002), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Exercise Stress Echocardiography for Stable Coronary Artery Disease: Succumbed to the Modern Conceptual Revolution or Still Alive and Kicking?Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWe evaluated the impact of contrast stress echocardiography (CSE) testing results on cardiovascular (CV) risk behaviors in postmenopausal women presenting with chest pain symptoms. This was a substudy of the Stress Echocardiography in Menopausal Women at Risk for Coronary Artery Disease (SMART) trial.
methodsFrom 2004 to 2007, 366 women (mean age 54.4 ± 5.5 years, range 40-65; body mass index (BMI) 31.4 ± 6.68; Caucasian in 95%) completed CSE and were invited to participate in the Women's Heart Clinic Risk Assessment Questionnaire (WHCRAQ survey) at the time of CSE and after 2 years. Of the 366, 203 (55%) postmenopausal women completed both the baseline and 2-year follow-up surveys (age 61 ± 5 years; Framingham risk score 6 ± 4%, 81% treadmill CSE, 19% dobutamine CSE). WHCRAQ assessed medical history, hormone therapy (HT), and CV risk behaviors (cigarette smoking history, including current smoking and mean cigarettes smoked per day; physical activity or exercise, including mean exercise minutes per week; and dietary fat intake, alcohol intake, and mean alcohol drinks per week). Abnormal CSE was defined as a new or worsening stress wall motion abnormality. Post-CSE changes in CV risk behaviors were determined by comparing baseline versus 2-year data.
resultsOf the 203 women who completed the survey at baseline and 2-year CSE, 29 were excluded to avoid confounding effect (coronary angiography [CA] was performed during follow-up). Of 174 women (55% hypertensive, 10% diabetic, 76% hyperlipidemic, and 25% on HT), CSE was abnormal in 10%. Baseline characteristics were not significantly different in normal versus abnormal CSE, apart from diabetes (8% vs. 24%, p=0.04). Slightly more women with normal CSE were taking HT than not (27% vs. 12%, p=0.19). CV risk behaviors that were different in normal versus abnormal CSE included current smoking, alcohol drinks per week, and higher fat diet (8% vs. 24%, p=0.03; 2.5 ± 3.5 vs. 1.94±5.2, p=0.031; and 92% vs. 76%, p=0.03, respectively). Cigarette smoking decreased (mean difference of -1.5 cigarettes per day, p=0.014) in the abnormal-CSE group, whereas number of alcohol drinks per week increased (mean difference +0.38, p=0.009) in the normal-CSE group.
conclusionWe observed an association of lifestyle changes with CSE test results in postmenopausal women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.