ArticlePloS one2014
Are numbers, size and brightness equally efficient in orienting visual attention? Evidence from an eye-tracking study.
Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mapping of non-numerical domains on space: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Experimental brain research · 2018Pooled it
- Trial
- Spatial coding of arithmetic operations in early learning: an eye tracking study in first-grade elementary school children.Psychological research · 2025Article
- Symbolic and non-symbolic numbers differently affect center identification in a number-line bisection task.PloS one · 2025Article
- Number, size, and space associated in a common system by distinct mechanisms.Psychological research · 2024Article
- What makes different number-space mappings interact?Psychological research · 2024Article
- Perceiving numerosity does not cause automatic shifts of spatial attention.Experimental brain research · 2021Article
- SNARC effect modulated by central executive control: revealed in a cue-based trisection task.Psychological research · 2021Article
- Electrophysiological Evidence of Space-Number Associations in 9-Month-Old Infants.Child development · 2021Article
- Emotional SNARC: emotional faces affect the impact of number magnitude on gaze patterns.Psychological research · 2021Article
- Can a Single Representational Object Account for Different Number-Space Mappings?Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2021Article
- Evidence for a visuospatial bias in decimal number comparison in adolescents and in adults.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Time dependency of the SNARC effect for different number formats: evidence from saccadic responses.Psychological research · 2019Article
- Article
- The Early Construction of Spatial Attention: Culture, Space, and Gesture in Parent-Child Interactions.Child development · 2018Article
- From Innate Spatial Biases to Enculturated Spatial Cognition: The Case of Spatial Associations in Number and Other Sequences.Frontiers in psychology · 2018Article
- Culturally inconsistent spatial structure reduces learning.Acta psychologica · 2016Article
- Insights into numerical cognition: considering eye-fixations in number processing and arithmetic.Psychological research · 2016Review
- SNARC for numerosities is modulated by comparative instruction (and resembles some non-numerical effects).Cognitive processing · 2016Article
- Operational momentum and size ordering in preverbal infants.Psychological research · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A number of studies have shown strong relations between numbers and oriented spatial codes. For example, perceiving numbers causes spatial shifts of attention depending upon numbers' magnitude, in a way suggestive of a spatially oriented, mental representation of numbers. Here, we investigated whether this phenomenon extends to non-symbolic numbers, as well as to the processing of the continuous dimensions of size and brightness, exploring whether different quantitative dimensions are equally mapped onto space. After a numerical (symbolic Arabic digits or non-symbolic arrays of dots; Experiment 1) or a non-numerical cue (shapes of different size or brightness level; Experiment 2) was presented, participants' saccadic response to a target that could appear either on the left or the right side of the screen was registered using an automated eye-tracker system. Experiment 1 showed that, both in the case of Arabic digits and dot arrays, right targets were detected faster when preceded by large numbers, and left targets were detected faster when preceded by small numbers. Participants in Experiment 2 were faster at detecting right targets when cued by large-sized shapes and left targets when cued by small-sized shapes, whereas brightness cues did not modulate the detection of peripheral targets. These findings indicate that looking at a symbolic or a non-symbolic number induces attentional shifts to a peripheral region of space that is congruent with the numbers' relative position on a mental number line, and that a similar shift in visual attention is induced by looking at shapes of different size. More specifically, results suggest that, while the dimensions of number and size spontaneously map onto an oriented space, the dimension of brightness seems to be independent at a certain level of magnitude elaboration from the dimensions of spatial extent and number, indicating that not all continuous dimensions are equally mapped onto space.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.