Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24932388›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of preventive medicine2014

Reducing the incidence of chronic lung disease in very premature infants with aminophylline.

Amir-Mohammad Armanian, Zohreh Badiee, Raha Afghari, Nima Salehimehr, Akbar Hassanzade, Soghra Sheikhzadeh, Maryam Shariftehrani, Gohar Rezvan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of preventive medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Methylxanthine for the prevention and treatment of apnea in preterm infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Amir-Mohammad ArmanianDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Child Growth and Development Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Zohreh BadieeDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Child Growth and Development Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Raha AfghariDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Nima SalehimehrAlmahdi University, Isfahan, Iran.
Akbar HassanzadeDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Health, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Soghra SheikhzadehDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Alzahra Hospital NICU, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Maryam ShariftehraniAlzahra Hospital Neonatal Unit, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Gohar RezvanShahid Beheshti Hospital NICU, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe objective of this study is to assess the safety and preventative effects of aminophylline on the incidence of chronic lung disease (CLD) in very premature infants.

methodsThis was a long follow-up randomized clinical trial. The prophylactic effect of aminophylline on the incidence of CLD was investigated in very premature infants. The study group received aminophylline for the 1(st) 10 days of life and control infants received no aminophylline during the 1(st) 10 days of life.

resultsFifty-two infants participated (26 aminophylline, 26 controls). Premature infants on aminophylline had clearly shorter oxygen dependency time than those in the control group. Median time of oxygen dependency was 3 (0-9.5) days and 14 (3-40.5) days in group A and C, respectively (P: 0.001). Incidence of CLD was significantly different between the two groups. Only two infants (8.7%) on aminophylline developed CLD, when compared to 11 infants (44.0%), who did not receive aminophylline (P: 0.006). No side-effects were reported in the neonates (P: 1).

conclusionsThis study supports the preventative effects of aminophylline on the incidence of CLD in very premature infants. In other words, the more premature the infants, the greater will be the preventative effect of aminophylline on the incidence of CLD.

Indexed as

Aminophyllinechronic lung diseasepreterm neonatesprevention

Identifiers

PMID24932388
PMCPMC4050677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.