ReviewCerebrovascular diseases extra2014
Primary Multiple Simultaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhages between 1950 and 2013: Analysis of Data on Age, Sex and Outcome.
Review in Cerebrovascular diseases extra, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Minimally invasive surgery for bilateral large basal ganglia hemorrhage: a rare case report and insights from literature.AME case reports · 2025Article
- Mirror Image of Spontaneous Intracranial Hemorrhage.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte ratio on admission predicts gastrointestinal bleeding in acute basal ganglia hemorrhage.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2022Article
- Spontaneous Bilateral Basal Ganglia Hemorrhage Due to Severe Hypertension.Vascular health and risk management · 2022Article
- Subsequent bilateral intracerebral hemorrhages in the putamen and thalamus: A report of four cases.Surgical neurology international · 2022Article
- Single and simultaneous multiple intracerebral hemorrhages: a radiological review.Acta neurologica Belgica · 2020Review
- Mixed cerebrovascular disease in an elderly patient with mixed vascular risk factors: a case report.BMC neurology · 2019Article
- Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis Complicated by Hypertrophic Pachymeningitis Presenting with Simultaneous Multiple Intracerebral Hemorrhages.Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2018Article
- Moyamoya disease manifested as multiple simultaneous intracerebral hemorrhages: A case report and literature review.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2016Article
- Delayed Consecutive Contralateral Thalamic Hemorrhage after Spontaneous Thalamic Hemorrhage.Journal of cerebrovascular and endovascular neurosurgery · 2016Article
- Neuroendoscopic minimally invasive surgery and small bone window craniotomy hematoma clearance in the treatment of hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage.Pakistan journal of medical sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrimary multiple simultaneous intracerebral hemorrhages (MSICHs) are quite rare. Although occasional reports have been found, there have been no systematic reviews. The published case reports and case series contain overlapping data, leading to erroneous information about MSICHs. This is the first extensive review of accessible studies published in English on MSICHs. Our primary objective was to analyze the demographic data on age, sex, outcome and prognosis with regard to primary MSICHs. SUMMARY: A PubMed search without language restriction for articles with results from human studies and registered between January 1950 and September 2013 yielded 677 articles. The following inclusion criteria were applied: (1) reported case(s) or case series on primary MSICHs; (2) text partly or fully in English, and (3) text contains identifiable data on age, sex and outcome of patients. A total of 24 articles met all the inclusion criteria. The reference lists of these 24 articles were inspected for additional relevant articles, which yielded another 20 articles. In all, 248 cases were identified; 143 cases were excluded for various reasons: 52 duplicate cases, 18 cases of multiple nonsimultaneous intracerebral hemorrhages, 25 cases of secondary MSICHs, and 48 cases with incomplete data on age, sex and outcome. The remaining 105 cases were analyzed. MSICHs were found to be more common in bilateral cases (53.33%): there were bilateral basal ganglia hemorrhages (33.33%), bilateral thalamic hemorrhages (18.10%), bilateral lobar hemorrhages (0.95%) and bilateral cerebellar hemorrhages (0.95%). Nonbilateral MSICHs were found in 46.67% of the cases. The hematomas were commonly distributed in the basal ganglia (45.83%), thalamus (30.56%) and cerebellum (10.19%). MSICHs were more frequently encountered in males (60.95%; average age: 59.13 ± 12.49 years). The average age of the female patients was higher (63.89 ± 13.11 years). Patients with primary MSICHs had a survival rate of 56.20%. There was a favorable outcome of primary MSICHs in 18.10% of all the cases, the highest proportion of which was in the nonbilateral MSICH group. The remaining 38.10% had unfavorable outcomes. Death occurred in 43.80% of all cases, the highest proportion being found in the bilateral basal ganglia hemorrhage group. Primary MSICHs share features with solitary intracerebral hemorrhage regarding age, sex, and the location and distribution of hematomas, but they have a poorer outcome (p < 0.05). KEY MESSAGES: Primary MSICHs are rare and share features with solitary intracerebral hemorrhage regarding age and the location and distribution of hematomas. Patients have a poorer prognosis but higher favorable outcome rates in case of survival. This information adds to the awareness of clinicians that higher rates of favorable outcomes can be achieved for MSICHs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.