Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24932083›Full record

SynthesisJournal of Korean medical science2014

The effectiveness of recombinant human thyroid-stimulating hormone versus thyroid hormone withdrawal prior to radioiodine remnant ablation in thyroid cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Kyoungjune Pak, Gi Jeong Cheon, Keon Wook Kang, Seong-Jang Kim, In-Joo Kim, E Edmund Kim, Dong Soo Lee, June-Key Chung

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of Korean medical science, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Diagnosis and treatment of patients with thyroid cancer.American health & drug benefits · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Kyoungjune PakDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea. ; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Korea. ; Medical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-5051-1894
Gi Jeong CheonDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea. ; Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-1360-5186
Keon Wook KangDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea. ; Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-2622-9017
Seong-Jang KimDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Korea. ; Medical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-5803-9934
In-Joo KimDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Korea. ; Medical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-1307-6146
E Edmund KimWCU Graduate School of Concergence Science and Technology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. ; University of California at Irvine, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3915-2525
Dong Soo LeeDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea. ; Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea. ; WCU Graduate School of Concergence Science and Technology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-9013-4835
June-Key ChungDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea. ; Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-6866-8571
Seoul National University Hospital · KRPusan National University Hospital · KRSeoul National University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We evaluated the efficacy of recombinant human thyroid-stimulating hormone (rhTSH) versus thyroid hormone withdrawal (THW) prior to radioiodine remnant ablation (RRA) in thyroid cancer. A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and SCOPUS was performed. Randomized controlled trials that compared ablation success between rhTSH and THW at 6 to 12 months following RRA were included in this study. Six trials with a total of 1,660 patients were included. When ablation success was defined as a thyroglobulin (Tg) cutoff of 1 ng/mL (risk ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.96-1.03) or a Tg cutoff of 1 ng/mL plus imaging modality (RR 0.97; 0.90-1.05), the results of rhTSH and THW were similar. There were no significant differences when ablation success was defined as a Tg cutoff of 2 ng/mL (RR 1.03; 0.95-1.11) or a Tg cutoff of 2 ng/mL plus imaging modality (RR 1.02; 0.95-1.09). When a negative (131)I-whole body scan was used solely as the definition of ablation success, the effects of rhTSH and THW were not significantly different (RR 0.97; 0.93-1.02). Therefore, ablation success rates are comparable when RRA is prepared by either rhTSH or THW.

Indexed as

Catheter AblationClinical Trials as TopicDatabases, FactualHumansIodine RadioisotopesRadiopharmaceuticalsRecombinant ProteinsRiskThyroglobulinThyroid NeoplasmsThyrotropinTreatment OutcomeUltrasonographyWhole Body ImagingIodine RadioisotopesRadiopharmaceuticalsRecombinant ProteinsThyroglobulinThyrotropinThyroid NeoplasmsThyrotropin Alfa

Identifiers

PMID24932083
PMCPMC4055815
OpenAlexW2171937766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.