ArticleJournal of Korean medical science2014
Improving the reliability of clinical practice guideline appraisals: effects of the Korean AGREE II scoring guide.
Article in Journal of Korean medical science, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Clinical Practice Guidelines on Normal Labour and Childbirth: A Systematic Review.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2026Pooled it
- A comprehensive systematic review of colorectal cancer screening clinical practices guidelines and consensus statements.British journal of cancer · 2023Pooled it
- Quality and reporting of clinical guidelines for breast cancer treatment: A systematic review.Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2020Pooled it
- Development of Quality Management Systems for Clinical Practice Guidelines in Korea.Journal of Korean medical science · 2015Guideline
- Quality in aesthetic medicine and surgery: a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines.Colombia medica (Cali, Colombia)Pooled it
- History of the Task Force for the Korean Clinical Guidelines of the Developmental Disorders.Journal of the Korean Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry · 2024Article
- Korean Clinical Practice Guidelines: Current Status of Adherence to the RIGHT Checklist.Journal of Korean medical science · 2022Article
- Clinical Practice Guideline for Postoperative Rehabilitation in Older Patients With Hip Fractures.Annals of rehabilitation medicine · 2021Article
- Korean clinical practice guideline for perioperative red blood cell transfusion from Korean Society of Anesthesiologists.Korean journal of anesthesiology · 2019Review
- Quality and utilization of the Finnish clinical practice guideline in schizophrenia: evaluation using AGREE II and the vignette approach.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2019Article
- Article
- Methodological Quality Appraisal of 27 Korean Guidelines Using a Scoring Guide Based on the AGREE II Instrument and a Web-based Evaluation.Journal of Korean medical science · 2016Article
- National Priority Setting of Clinical Practice Guidelines Development for Chronic Disease Management.Journal of Korean medical science · 2015Article
- The quality of clinical practice guidelines in traditional medicine in Korea: appraisal using the AGREE II instrument.Implementation science : IS · 2015Article
- Applying the RE-AIM Framework to Evaluate the Dissemination and Implementation of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Sexually Transmitted Infections.Journal of Korean medical science · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Korean translated Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (Korean AGREE II) instrument was distributed into Korean medical societies in 2011. However, inter-rater disagreement issues still exist. The Korean AGREE II scoring guide was therefore developed to reduce inter-rater differences. This study examines the effects of the Korean AGREE II scoring guide to reduce inter-rater differences. Appraisers were randomly assigned to two groups (Scoring Guide group and Non-Scoring Guide group). The Korean AGREE II instrument was provided to both groups. However, the scoring guide was offered to Scoring Guide group only. Total 14 appraisers were participated and each guideline was assessed by 8 appraisers. To evaluate the reliability of the Korean AGREE II scoring guide, correlation of scores among appraisers and domain-specific intra-class correlation (ICC) were compared. Most scores of two groups were comparable. Scoring Guide group showed higher reliability at all guidelines. They showed higher correlation among appraisers and higher ICC values at almost all domains. The scoring guide reduces the inter-rater disagreement and improves the overall reliability of the Korean-AGREE II instrument.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.