Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24932007›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2014

Robust clinical outcome prediction based on Bayesian analysis of transcriptional profiles and prior causal networks.

Kourosh Zarringhalam, Ahmed Enayetallah, Padmalatha Reddy, Daniel Ziemek

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kourosh ZarringhalamComputational Sciences Center of Emphasis, Pfizer Worldwide R&D, Cambridge, Department of Mathematics, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA, Drug Safety Research & Development, Pfizer Worldwide R&D, Groton, CT, USA and Computational Sciences Center of Emphasis, Pfizer Worldwide R&D, Berlin, GermanyComputational Sciences Center of Emphasis, Pfizer Worldwide R&D, Cambridge, Department of Mathematics, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA, Drug Safety Research & Development, Pfizer Worldwide R&D, Groton, CT, USA and Computational Sciences Center of Emphasis, Pfizer Worldwide R&D, Berlin, Germany.
Ahmed EnayetallahComputational Sciences Center of Emphasis, Pfizer Worldwide R&D, Cambridge, Department of Mathematics, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA, Drug Safety Research & Development, Pfizer Worldwide R&D, Groton, CT, USA and Computational Sciences Center of Emphasis, Pfizer Worldwide R&D, Berlin, Germany.
Padmalatha ReddyComputational Sciences Center of Emphasis, Pfizer Worldwide R&D, Cambridge, Department of Mathematics, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA, Drug Safety Research & Development, Pfizer Worldwide R&D, Groton, CT, USA and Computational Sciences Center of Emphasis, Pfizer Worldwide R&D, Berlin, Germany.
Daniel ZiemekComputational Sciences Center of Emphasis, Pfizer Worldwide R&D, Cambridge, Department of Mathematics, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA, Drug Safety Research & Development, Pfizer Worldwide R&D, Groton, CT, USA and Computational Sciences Center of Emphasis, Pfizer Worldwide R&D, Berlin, Germany.
Pfizer (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationUnderstanding and predicting an individual's response in a clinical trial is the key to better treatments and cost-: effective medicine. Over the coming years, more and more large-scale omics datasets will become available to characterize patients with complex and heterogeneous diseases at a molecular level. Unfortunately, genetic, phenotypical and environmental variation is much higher in a human trial population than currently modeled or measured in most animal studies. In our experience, this high variability can lead to failure of trained predictors in independent studies and undermines the credibility and utility of promising high-dimensional datasets.

methodsWe propose a method that utilizes patient-level genome-wide expression data in conjunction with causal networks based on prior knowledge. Our approach determines a differential expression profile for each patient and uses a Bayesian approach to infer corresponding upstream regulators. These regulators and their corresponding posterior probabilities of activity are used in a regularized regression framework to predict response.

resultsWe validated our approach using two clinically relevant phenotypes, namely acute rejection in kidney transplantation and response to Infliximab in ulcerative colitis. To demonstrate pitfalls in translating trained predictors across independent trials, we analyze performance characteristics of our approach as well as alternative feature sets in the regression on two independent datasets for each phenotype. We show that the proposed approach is able to successfully incorporate causal prior knowledge to give robust performance estimates.

Indexed as

Gene Regulatory NetworksAlgorithmsAntibodies, MonoclonalBayes TheoremColitis, UlcerativeGene Expression ProfilingGene OntologyGraft RejectionHumansInfliximabKidney TransplantationPhenotypeRegression AnalysisTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, MonoclonalInfliximab

Identifiers

PMID24932007
PMCPMC4058945
OpenAlexW2144502656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.