Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24931976›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2014

Functional association networks as priors for gene regulatory network inference.

Matthew E Studham, Andreas Tjärnberg, Torbjörn E M Nordling, Sven Nelander, Erik L L Sonnhammer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Windowed Granger causal inference strategy improves discovery of gene regulatory networks.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Structure Optimization for Large Gene Networks Based on Greedy Strategy.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Langerhans Cells-Programmed by the Epidermis.Frontiers in immunology · 2017
    Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Matthew E StudhamStockholm Bioinformatics Centre, Science for Life Laboratory, SE-171 65 Solna, Sweden, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Stockholm University, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden, Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Rudbeck Laboratory, SE-751 05 Uppsala, Sweden and Swedish eScience Research Center, SE-100 44 Stockholm, SwedenStockholm Bioinformatics Centre, Science for Life Laboratory, SE-171 65 Solna, Sweden, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Stockholm University, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden, Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Rudbeck Laboratory, SE-751 05 Uppsala, Sweden and Swedish eScience Research Center, SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden.
Andreas TjärnbergStockholm Bioinformatics Centre, Science for Life Laboratory, SE-171 65 Solna, Sweden, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Stockholm University, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden, Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Rudbeck Laboratory, SE-751 05 Uppsala, Sweden and Swedish eScience Research Center, SE-100 44 Stockholm, SwedenStockholm Bioinformatics Centre, Science for Life Laboratory, SE-171 65 Solna, Sweden, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Stockholm University, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden, Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Rudbeck Laboratory, SE-751 05 Uppsala, Sweden and Swedish eScience Research Center, SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden.
Torbjörn E M NordlingStockholm Bioinformatics Centre, Science for Life Laboratory, SE-171 65 Solna, Sweden, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Stockholm University, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden, Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Rudbeck Laboratory, SE-751 05 Uppsala, Sweden and Swedish eScience Research Center, SE-100 44 Stockholm, SwedenStockholm Bioinformatics Centre, Science for Life Laboratory, SE-171 65 Solna, Sweden, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Stockholm University, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden, Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Rudbeck Laboratory, SE-751 05 Uppsala, Sweden and Swedish eScience Research Center, SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden.
Sven NelanderStockholm Bioinformatics Centre, Science for Life Laboratory, SE-171 65 Solna, Sweden, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Stockholm University, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden, Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Rudbeck Laboratory, SE-751 05 Uppsala, Sweden and Swedish eScience Research Center, SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden.
Erik L L SonnhammerStockholm Bioinformatics Centre, Science for Life Laboratory, SE-171 65 Solna, Sweden, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Stockholm University, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden, Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Rudbeck Laboratory, SE-751 05 Uppsala, Sweden and Swedish eScience Research Center, SE-100 44 Stockholm, SwedenStockholm Bioinformatics Centre, Science for Life Laboratory, SE-171 65 Solna, Sweden, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Stockholm University, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden, Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Rudbeck Laboratory, SE-751 05 Uppsala, Sweden and Swedish eScience Research Center, SE-100 44 Stockholm, SwedenStockholm Bioinformatics Centre, Science for Life Laboratory, SE-171 65 Solna, Sweden, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Stockholm University, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden, Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Rudbeck Laboratory, SE-751 05 Uppsala, Sweden and Swedish eScience Research Center, SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationGene regulatory network (GRN) inference reveals the influences genes have on one another in cellular regulatory systems. If the experimental data are inadequate for reliable inference of the network, informative priors have been shown to improve the accuracy of inferences.

resultsThis study explores the potential of undirected, confidence-weighted networks, such as those in functional association databases, as a prior source for GRN inference. Such networks often erroneously indicate symmetric interaction between genes and may contain mostly correlation-based interaction information. Despite these drawbacks, our testing on synthetic datasets indicates that even noisy priors reflect some causal information that can improve GRN inference accuracy. Our analysis on yeast data indicates that using the functional association databases FunCoup and STRING as priors can give a small improvement in GRN inference accuracy with biological data.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingGene Regulatory NetworksSaccharomyces cerevisiae

Identifiers

PMID24931976
PMCPMC4058914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.