Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24931439›Full record

ReviewExpert opinion on drug discovery2014

Recent advances using zebrafish animal models for muscle disease drug discovery.

Lisa Maves

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Expert opinion on drug discovery, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Cells · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Therapeutic Strategies Targeting DUX4 in FSHD.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Zebrafish models of sarcopenia.Disease models & mechanisms · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lisa MavesUniversity of Washington School of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Cardiology , Seattle, WA , USA.
University of Washington · US

Funding

Regulation of muscle fiber type and resistance to muscular dystrophyR03AR065760 · NIAMS · SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI MAVES, LISA · 2014 to 2016
$293k
NIAMS NIH HHS R03 AR065760
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAnimal models have enabled great progress in the discovery and understanding of pharmacological approaches for treating muscle diseases like Duchenne muscular dystrophy. AREAS COVERED: With this article, the author provides the reader with a description of the zebrafish animal model, which has been employed to identify and study pharmacological approaches to muscle disease. In particular, the author focuses on how both large-scale chemical screens and targeted drug treatment studies have established zebrafish as an important model for muscle disease drug discovery. EXPERT OPINION: There are a number of opportunities arising for the use of zebrafish models for further developing pharmacological approaches to muscle diseases, including studying drug combination therapies and utilizing genome editing to engineer zebrafish muscle disease models. It is the author's particular belief that the availability of a wide range of zebrafish transgenic strains for labeling immune cell types, combined with live imaging and drug treatment of muscle disease models, should allow for new elegant studies demonstrating how pharmacological approaches might influence inflammation and the immune response in muscle disease.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedDrug DiscoveryHumansInflammationMuscular DiseasesMuscular Dystrophy, DuchenneZebrafishbirefringencedrug screenDuchenne muscular dystrophymuscle functionmuscle structuremyopathyzebrafish

Identifiers

PMID24931439
PMCPMC4697731
OpenAlexW2069955791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.