Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24931168›Full record

ReviewOncogene2015

Epigenetic mechanisms of tumorigenicity manifesting in stem cells.

P-Y Tung, P S Knoepfler

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Oncogene, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Repressors of reprogramming.World journal of stem cells · 2015
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

P-Y Tung1] Department of Cell Biology and Human Anatomy, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Davis, CA, USA [2] UC Davis Genome Center, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, USA [3] UC Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA, USA [4] Institute of Pediatric Regenerative Medicine, Shriners Hospital For Children Northern California, Sacramento, CA, USA.
P S Knoepfler1] Department of Cell Biology and Human Anatomy, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Davis, CA, USA [2] UC Davis Genome Center, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, USA [3] UC Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA, USA [4] Institute of Pediatric Regenerative Medicine, Shriners Hospital For Children Northern California, Sacramento, CA, USA.
University of California, Davis · US

Funding

Myc Regulation of Embryonic Stem Cell Self-Renewal and PluripotencyR01GM100782 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI KNOEPFLER, PAUL S · 2011 to 2015
$1.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS 1R01GM100782NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM100782
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the biggest roadblocks to using stem cells as the basis for regenerative medicine therapies is the tumorigenicity of stem cells. Unfortunately, the unique abilities of stem cells to self-renew and differentiate into a variety of cell types are also mechanistically linked to their tumorigenic behaviors. Understanding the mechanisms underlying the close relationship between stem cells and cancer cells has therefore become a primary goal in the field. In addition, knowledge gained from investigating the striking parallels between mechanisms orchestrating normal embryogenesis and those that invoke tumorigenesis may well serve as the foundation for developing novel cancer treatments. Emerging discoveries have demonstrated that epigenetic regulatory machinery has important roles in normal stem cell functions, cancer development and cancer stem cell (CSC) identity. These studies provide valuable insights into both the shared and distinct mechanisms by which pluripotency and oncogenicity are established and regulated. In this review, the cancer-related epigenetic mechanisms found in pluripotent stem cells and cancer cells will be discussed, focusing on both the similarities and the differences.

Indexed as

Epigenesis, GeneticAnimalsCell Transformation, NeoplasticDNA MethylationHumansNeoplastic Stem CellsPluripotent Stem Cells

Identifiers

PMID24931168
PMCPMC4268091
OpenAlexW2064374913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.