ReviewOncogene2015
Epigenetic mechanisms of tumorigenicity manifesting in stem cells.
Review in Oncogene, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Stem cell therapy in Alzheimer's disease: current status and perspectives.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Review
- Epi-immunotherapy for cancers: rationales of epi-drugs in combination with immunotherapy and advances in clinical trials.Cancer communications (London, England) · 2022Review
- hUC-MSCs: evaluation of acute and long-term routine toxicity testing in mice and rats.Cytotechnology · 2022Article
- Epigenetic mechanisms in metal carcinogenesis.Toxicology reports · 2022Review
- Review
- Advances in regenerative therapy: A review of the literature and future directions.Regenerative therapy · 2020Review
- Biology and pathogenesis of human osteosarcoma.Oncology letters · 2020Review
- Senescence-Inflammatory Regulation of Reparative Cellular Reprogramming in Aging and Cancer.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2017Article
- Oncometabolic Nuclear Reprogramming of Cancer Stemness.Stem cell reports · 2016Article
- Advances and Challenges on Cancer Cells Reprogramming Using Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Technologies.Journal of Cancer · 2016Review
- Article
- Repressors of reprogramming.World journal of stem cells · 2015Review
- Defined culture of human embryonic stem cells and xeno-free derivation of retinal pigmented epithelial cells on a novel, synthetic substrate.Stem cells translational medicine · 2015Article
- Metabolic control of cancer cell stemness: Lessons from iPS cells.Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.) · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
One of the biggest roadblocks to using stem cells as the basis for regenerative medicine therapies is the tumorigenicity of stem cells. Unfortunately, the unique abilities of stem cells to self-renew and differentiate into a variety of cell types are also mechanistically linked to their tumorigenic behaviors. Understanding the mechanisms underlying the close relationship between stem cells and cancer cells has therefore become a primary goal in the field. In addition, knowledge gained from investigating the striking parallels between mechanisms orchestrating normal embryogenesis and those that invoke tumorigenesis may well serve as the foundation for developing novel cancer treatments. Emerging discoveries have demonstrated that epigenetic regulatory machinery has important roles in normal stem cell functions, cancer development and cancer stem cell (CSC) identity. These studies provide valuable insights into both the shared and distinct mechanisms by which pluripotency and oncogenicity are established and regulated. In this review, the cancer-related epigenetic mechanisms found in pluripotent stem cells and cancer cells will be discussed, focusing on both the similarities and the differences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.