Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24931109›Full record

ArticleGait & posture2014

Identification of the neural component of torque during manually-applied spasticity assessments in children with cerebral palsy.

L Bar-On, K Desloovere, G Molenaers, J Harlaar, T Kindt, E Aertbeliën

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Gait & posture, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Technology-assisted assessment of spasticity: a systematic review.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

L Bar-OnUniversity Hospital Pellenberg, Clinical Motion Analysis Laboratory, University Hospital, Leuven, Belgium; KU Leuven Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Leuven, Belgium.
K DesloovereUniversity Hospital Pellenberg, Clinical Motion Analysis Laboratory, University Hospital, Leuven, Belgium; KU Leuven Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Leuven, Belgium.
G MolenaersUniversity Hospital Pellenberg, Clinical Motion Analysis Laboratory, University Hospital, Leuven, Belgium; KU Leuven Department of Development and Regeneration, Leuven, Belgium; University Hospital Pellenberg, Department of Orthopedics, Leuven, Belgium.
J HarlaarDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, MOVE Research Institute Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
T KindtKU Leuven Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Leuven, Belgium.
E AertbeliënKU Leuven Department of Mechanical Engineering, Leuven, Belgium.
KU Leuven · BEAmsterdam UMC Location VUmc · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical assessment of spasticity is compromised by the difficulty to distinguish neural from non-neural components of increased joint torque. Quantifying the contributions of each of these components is crucial to optimize the selection of anti-spasticity treatments such as botulinum toxin (BTX). The aim of this study was to compare different biomechanical parameters that quantify the neural contribution to ankle joint torque measured during manually-applied passive stretches to the gastrocsoleus in children with spastic cerebral palsy (CP). The gastrocsoleus of 53 children with CP (10.9 ± 3.7 y; females n = 14; bilateral/unilateral involvement n = 28/25; Gross Motor Functional Classification Score I-IV) and 10 age-matched typically developing (TD) children were assessed using a manually-applied, instrumented spasticity assessment. Joint angle characteristics, root mean square electromyography and joint torque were simultaneously recorded during passive stretches at increasing velocities. From the CP cohort, 10 muscles were re-assessed for between-session reliability and 19 muscles were re-assessed 6 weeks post-BTX. A parameter related to mechanical work, containing both neural and non-neural components, was compared to newly developed parameters that were based on the modeling of passive stiffness and viscosity. The difference between modeled and measured response provided a quantification of the neural component. Both types of parameters were reliable (ICC > 0.95) and distinguished TD from spastic muscles (p < 0.001). However, only the newly developed parameters significantly decreased post-BTX (p = 0.012). Identifying the neural and non-neural contributions to increased joint torque allows for the development of individually tailored tone management.

Indexed as

AdolescentAnkle JointBiomechanical PhenomenaBotulinum Toxins, Type ACase-Control StudiesCerebral PalsyChildChild, PreschoolElectromyographyFemaleHumansMaleMuscle SpasticityNeuromuscular AgentsReproducibility of ResultsTorqueBotulinum Toxins, Type ANeuromuscular AgentsBotulinum toxin-ACerebral palsyHypertoniaMuscle modelingSpasticityTorque

Identifiers

PMID24931109
OpenAlexW2048244998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.