Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24929865›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2014

FOLFOX as second-line chemotherapy in patients with pretreated metastatic pancreatic cancer from the FIRGEM study.

Aziz Zaanan, Isabelle Trouilloud, Theofano Markoutsaki, Mélanie Gauthier, Anne-Claire Dupont-Gossart, Thierry Lecomte, Thomas Aparicio, Pascal Artru, Anne Thirot-Bidault, Fanny Joubert and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. A clinical evaluation of anFrontiers in medicine · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: Beyond first line, where are we?World journal of gastroenterology · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Aziz Zaanan
Isabelle Trouilloud
Theofano Markoutsaki
Mélanie Gauthier
Anne-Claire Dupont-Gossart
Thierry Lecomte
Thomas Aparicio
Pascal Artru
Anne Thirot-Bidault
Fanny Joubert
Daniella Fanica
Julien TaiebDepartment of Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, AP-HP, 20 rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France. julien.taieb@egp.aphp.fr.
Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRBicêtre Hospital · FRCentre Georges François Leclerc · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Tours · FRDélégation Paris 5 · FRHôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou · FRHôpital Privé Jean Mermo · FRUniversité Paris Cité · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFOLFOX second-line treatment seems to be a validated option for patients with pancreatic cancer (PC) progressing after gemcitabine chemotherapy. However, other therapeutics strategy has developed in first-line therapy, as the FIRGEM phase II study that evaluated gemcitabine alone versus FOLFIRI.3 alternating with gemcitabine every two months. The present study assessed the efficacy and safety of FOLFOX after failure of the first-line therapy used in the FIRGEM study.

methodsIn this prospective observational cohort study, we analysed all consecutive patients who received second-line chemotherapy with FOLFOX among 98 patients with metastatic PC included in the FIRGEM study. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated from the start of second-line chemotherapy using the Kaplan-Meier method.

resultsAmong 46 patients who received second-line chemotherapy, 27 patients (male, 55%; median age, 61 years; performance status (PS) 0-1, 44%) were treated with FOLFOX after progression to first-line gemcitabine alone (n = 20) or FOLFIRI.3 alternating with gemcitabine (n = 7). Grade 3 toxicity was observed in 33% of patients (no grade 4 toxicity). At the end of follow-up, all patients had progressed and 25 had died. No objective response was observed, and disease control rate was 36%. Median PFS and OS were 1.7 and 4.3 months, respectively. In multivariate analysis, PS was the only independent prognostic factor. For patients PS 0-1 versus 2-3, median PFS was 3.0 versus 1.2 months (log rank, p = 0.002), and median OS was 5.9 versus 2.6 months (log rank, p = 0.001).

conclusionsThis study suggests that FOLFOX second-line therapy offered interesting efficacy results with an acceptable toxicity profile in metastatic PC patients with a good PS.

Indexed as

AgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsFemaleFluorouracilHumansLeucovorinMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisOrganoplatinum CompoundsPancreatic NeoplasmsPrognosisTreatment OutcomeFluorouracilLeucovorinOrganoplatinum Compounds

Identifiers

PMID24929865
PMCPMC4075567
OpenAlexW1992160358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.