Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24929535›Full record

ReviewJACC. Heart failure2014

Charting a roadmap for heart failure biomarker studies.

Tariq Ahmad, Mona Fiuzat, Michael J Pencina, Nancy L Geller, Faiez Zannad, John G F Cleland, James V Snider, Stephan Blankenberg, Kirkwood F Adams, Rita F Redberg and 6 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JACC. Heart failure, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. IdentifyingBiomolecules · 2024
    Article
  7. New Biomarkers for Cardiovascular Disease.Texas Heart Institute journal · 2023
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Cardiac Biomarkers: What Is and What Can Be.Indian journal of cardiovascular disease in women WINCARS · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Tariq AhmadDivision of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina.
Mona FiuzatDivision of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina.
Michael J PencinaDivision of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Nancy L GellerOffice of Biostatistics Research, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
Faiez ZannadNancy University, Nancy, France.
John G F ClelandUniversity of Hull, Yorkshire, United Kingdom.
James V SniderCritical Diagnostics, San Diego, California.
Stephan BlankenbergJohannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.
Kirkwood F AdamsDivision of Cardiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Rita F RedbergDivision of Cardiology, UCSF, San Francisco, California.
Jae B KimAmgen, Thousand Oaks, California.
Alice MascetteDivision of Cardiovascular Sciences, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
Robert J MentzDivision of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Christopher M O'ConnorDivision of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina.
G Michael FelkerDivision of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina.
James L JanuzziDivision of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; Division of Cardiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. Electronic address: jjanuzzi@partners.org.

Funding

UNC-Duke Collaborative Clinical Pharmacology Postdoctoral Training Program-Evaluation SupplementT32GM086330 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI KIM L.R. BROUWER, Daniel Gonzalez · 2011 to 2026
$8.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM086330
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heart failure is a syndrome with a pathophysiological basis that can be traced to dysfunction in several interconnected molecular pathways. Identification of biomarkers of heart failure that allow measurement of the disease on a molecular level has resulted in enthusiasm for their use in prognostication and selection of appropriate therapies. However, despite considerable amounts of information available on numerous biomarkers, inconsistent research methodologies and lack of clinical correlations have made bench-to-bedside translations rare and left the literature with countless publications of varied quality. There is a need for a systematic and collaborative approach aimed at definitively studying the clinical benefits of novel biomarkers. In this review, on the basis of input from academia, industry, and governmental agencies, we propose a systematized approach based on adherence to specific quality measures for studies looking to augment current prediction model or use biomarkers to tailor therapeutics. We suggest that study quality, rather than results, should determine publication and propose a system for grading biomarker studies. We outline the need for collaboration between clinical investigators and statisticians to introduce more advanced statistical methodologies into the field of biomarkers that would allow for data from a large number of variables to be distilled into clinically actionable information. Lastly, we propose the creation of a heart failure biomarker consortium that would allow for a comprehensive list of biomarkers to be concomitantly analyzed in a pooled sample of randomized clinical trials and hypotheses to be generated for testing in biomarker-guided trials. Such a consortium could collaborate in sharing samples to identify biomarkers, undertake meta-analyses on completed trials, and spearhead clinical trials to test the clinical utility of new biomarkers.

Indexed as

BiomarkersCooperative BehaviorHeart FailureHumansPrognosisResearch DesignBiomarkersbiomarkersheart failurestudies

Identifiers

PMID24929535
PMCPMC4194170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.