Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24929097›Full record

SynthesisJournal of the International AIDS Society2014

Diagnostic accuracy of the WHO clinical staging system for defining eligibility for ART in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Chigomezgo Munthali, Miriam Taegtmeyer, Paul G Garner, David G Lalloo, S Bertel Squire, Elizabeth L Corbett, Nathan Ford, Peter MacPherson

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of the International AIDS Society, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Tracking Cryptococcal Meningitis to Monitor HIV Program Success During the Treat All Era: An Analysis of National Data in Botswana.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Reduction in Baseline CD4 Count Testing Following Human Immunodeficiency Virus "Treat All" Adoption in Uganda.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2020
    Article
  19. The Enduring Burden of Advanced Human Immunodeficiency Virus Disease.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2020
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Chigomezgo MunthaliDepartment of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK; chigomw@yahoo.com.
Miriam TaegtmeyerDepartment of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
Paul G GarnerDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
David G LallooDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
S Bertel SquireDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
Elizabeth L CorbettTB and HIV Group, Malawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme, Blantyre, Malawi; Department of Clinical Research, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Nathan FordDepartment of HIV/AIDS, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Peter MacPhersonDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK; TB and HIV Group, Malawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme, Blantyre, Malawi.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 091769Wellcome Trust 100714Wellcome Trust 100890Wellcome Trust 101113Wellcome Trust WT089673World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe World Health Organization (WHO) recommends that HIV-positive adults with CD4 count ≤500 cells/mm(3) initiate antiretroviral therapy (ART). In many countries of sub-Saharan Africa, CD4 count is not widely available or consistently used and instead the WHO clinical staging system is used to determine ART eligibility. However, concerns have been raised regarding its discriminatory ability to identify patients eligible to start ART. We therefore reviewed the accuracy of WHO stage 3 or 4 assessment in identifying ART eligibility according to CD4 count thresholds for ART initiation.

methodsWe systematically searched PubMed and Global Health databases and conference abstracts using a comprehensive strategy for studies that compared the results of WHO clinical staging with CD4 count thresholds. Studies performed in sub-Saharan Africa and published in English between 1998 and 2013 were eligible for inclusion according to our predefined study protocol. Two authors independently extracted data and assessed methodological quality and risk of bias using the Quality Assessment Tool for Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool. Summary estimates of sensitivity and specificity were derived for each CD4 count threshold and hierarchical summary receiver operator characteristic curves were plotted.

resultsFifteen studies met the inclusion criteria, including 25,032 participants from 14 countries. Most studies assessed individuals attending ART clinics prior to treatment initiation. WHO clinical stage 3 or 4 disease had a sensitivity of 60% (95% CI: 45-73%, Q=914.26, p<0.001) and specificity of 73% (95% CI: 60-83%, Q=1439.43, p<0.001) for a CD4 threshold of ≤200 cells/mm(3) (11 studies); sensitivity and specificity for a threshold of CD4 count ≤350 cells/mm(3) were 45% (95% CI: 26-66%, Q=1607.31, p<0.001) and 85% (95% CI: 69-93%, Q=896.70, p<0.001), respectively (six studies). For the threshold of CD4 count ≤500 cells/mm(3) sensitivity was 14% (95% CI: 13-15%) and specificity was 95% (95% CI: 94-96%) (one study).

conclusionsWhen used for individual treatment decisions, WHO clinical staging misses a high proportion of individuals who are ART eligible by CD4 count, with sensitivity falling as CD4 count criteria rises. Access to accurate, accessible, robust and affordable CD4 count testing methods will be a pressing need for as long as ART initiation decisions are based on criteria other than seropositivity.

Indexed as

AdultAfrica South of the SaharaAnti-HIV AgentsCD4 Lymphocyte CountHIV InfectionsHumansPractice Guidelines as TopicSensitivity and SpecificitySeverity of Illness IndexWorld Health OrganizationAnti-HIV Agentsantiretroviral therapyCD4 cell countHIVsub-Saharan Africasystematic reviewsWHO clinical staging system

Identifiers

PMID24929097
PMCPMC4057784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.