Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24928945›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2014

Hydroxychloroquine inhibits autophagy to potentiate antiestrogen responsiveness in ER+ breast cancer.

Katherine L Cook, Anni Wärri, David R Soto-Pantoja, Pamela Ag Clarke, M Idalia Cruz, Alan Zwart, Robert Clarke

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 119 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
119citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

119 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 236 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Autophagy modulation in cancer.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. MinimalRSC chemical biology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Autophagy: The convergence point of aging and cancer.Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

59 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Katherine L CookAuthors' Affiliations: Department of Oncology and Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, D.C.; and Department of Pathology, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland.
Anni WärriAuthors' Affiliations: Department of Oncology and Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, D.C.; and Department of Pathology, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland.
David R Soto-PantojaAuthors' Affiliations: Department of Oncology and Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, D.C.; and Department of Pathology, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland.
Pamela Ag ClarkeAuthors' Affiliations: Department of Oncology and Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, D.C.; and Department of Pathology, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland.
M Idalia CruzAuthors' Affiliations: Department of Oncology and Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, D.C.; and Department of Pathology, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland.
Alan ZwartAuthors' Affiliations: Department of Oncology and Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, D.C.; and Department of Pathology, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland.
Robert ClarkeAuthors' Affiliations: Department of Oncology and Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, D.C.; and Department of Pathology, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland clarker@georgetown.edu.
Georgetown University · USNational Cancer Institute · USGeorgetown University Medical Center · US

Funding

Tissue Culture Shared ResourceP30CA051008 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI STEPHEN W BYERS · 1990 to 2026
$71.5M
TRAINING GRANT IN TUMOR BIOLOGYT32CA009686 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI ANNA Tate RIEGEL, DAVID J ROBBINS · 1996 to 2026
$10.8M
Timing of dietary exposure and breast cancer riskU54CA100970 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI HILAKIVI-CLARKE, LEENA A. · 2003 to 2008
$7.2M
Novel Targets in Endocrine ResponsivenessU54CA149147 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI CLARKE, ROBERT R. · 2010 to 2014
$6.9M
Endocrine resistance in breast cancerR01CA131465 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI CLARKE, ROBERT R. · 2009 to 2013
$1.7M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA051008NCI NIH HHS R01 CA131465NCI NIH HHS R01-CA131465NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009686NCI NIH HHS U54 CA100970NCI NIH HHS U54 CA149147NCI NIH HHS U54-CA149147
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEstrogen receptor-α (ERα)-targeted therapies including tamoxifen (TAM) or Faslodex (ICI) are used to treat ER(+) breast cancers. Up to 50% of tumors will acquire resistance to these interventions. Autophagy has been implicated as a major driver of antiestrogen resistance. We have explored the ability of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), which inhibits autophagy, to affect antiestrogen responsiveness. EXPERIMENTAL

designTAM-resistant MCF7-RR and ICI-resistant/TAM cross-resistant LCC9 ER(+) breast cancer cells were injected into mammary fat pads of female athymic mice and treated with TAM and/or ICI in combination with oral low-dose HCQ.

resultsWe show that HCQ can increase antiestrogen responsiveness in MCF7-RR and LCC9 cells and tumors, likely through the inhibition of autophagy. However, the combination of ICI+HCQ was less effective than HCQ alone in vivo, unlike the TAM+HCQ combination. Antiestrogen treatment stimulated angiogenesis in tumors but did not prevent HCQ effectiveness. The lower efficacy of ICI+HCQ was associated with ICI effects on cell-mediated immunity within the tumor microenvironment. The mouse chemokine KC (CXCL1) and IFNγ were differentially regulated by both TAM and ICI treatments, suggesting a possible effect on macrophage development/activity. Consistent with these observations, TAM+HCQ treatment increased tumor CD68(+) cells infiltration, whereas ICI and ICI+HCQ reduced peripheral tumor macrophage content. Moreover, macrophage elimination of breast cancer target cells in vitro was reduced following exposure to ICI.

conclusionHCQ restores antiestrogen sensitivity to resistant tumors. Moreover, the beneficial combination of TAM+HCQ suggests a positive outcome for ongoing neoadjuvant clinical trials using this combination for the treatment of ER(+) ductal carcinoma in situ lesions.

Indexed as

AnimalsApoptosisAutophagyBlotting, WesternBreast NeoplasmsCell DifferentiationCell ProliferationDrug Resistance, NeoplasmEstradiolEstrogen AntagonistsEstrogen Receptor ModulatorsFemaleFulvestrantHumansHydroxychloroquineImmunoenzyme TechniquesEstradiolEstrogen AntagonistsEstrogen Receptor ModulatorsFulvestrantHydroxychloroquineReceptors, EstrogenTamoxifen

Identifiers

PMID24928945
PMCPMC4073207
OpenAlexW2034693873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.