Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24928891›Full record

ArticleToxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology2014

In silico identification and pharmacological evaluation of novel endocrine disrupting chemicals that act via the ligand-binding domain of the estrogen receptor α.

Fiona M McRobb, Irina Kufareva, Ruben Abagyan

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Exploring Fatty Acid Mimetics as NR4A Ligands.Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2023
    Article
  2. Review ofFrontiers in endocrinology · 2022
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Computer-Aided Ligand Discovery for Estrogen Receptor Alpha.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  5. Article
  6. From Homology Models to a Set of Predictive Binding Pockets-a 5-HTJournal of chemical information and modeling · 2017
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Fiona M McRobbSkaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92093 ikufareva@ucsd.edu ruben@ucsd.edu.
Irina KufarevaSkaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92093 ikufareva@ucsd.edu ruben@ucsd.edu.
Ruben AbagyanSkaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92093 ikufareva@ucsd.edu ruben@ucsd.edu.
University of California, San Diego · US

Funding

Project 3U54GM094618 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI STEVENS, RAYMOND C · 2010 to 2014
$17.1M
Structure, Dynamics and Activation Mechanisms of Chemokine ReceptorsU01GM094612 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI CHANCE, MARK R · 2010 to 2014
$4.5M
Macromolecular DockingR01GM071872 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI ABAGYAN, RUBEN · 2004 to 2017
$4.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM071872NIGMS NIH HHS U01 GM094612NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM094618
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) pose a significant threat to human health, society, and the environment. Many EDCs elicit their toxic effects through nuclear hormone receptors, like the estrogen receptor α (ERα). In silico models can be used to prioritize chemicals for toxicological evaluation to reduce the amount of costly pharmacological testing and enable early alerts for newly designed compounds. However, many of the current computational models are overly dependent on the chemistry of known modulators and perform poorly for novel chemical scaffolds. Herein we describe the development of computational, three-dimensional multi-conformational pocket-field docking, and chemical-field docking models for the identification of novel EDCs that act via the ligand-binding domain of ERα. These models were highly accurate in the retrospective task of distinguishing known high-affinity ERα modulators from inactive or decoy molecules, with minimal training. To illustrate the utility of the models in prospective in silico compound screening, we screened a database of over 6000 environmental chemicals and evaluated the 24 top-ranked hits in an ERα transcriptional activation assay and a differential scanning fluorimetry-based ERα binding assay. Promisingly, six chemicals displayed ERα agonist activity (32nM-3.98μM) and two chemicals had moderately stabilizing effects on ERα. Two newly identified active compounds were chemically related β-adrenergic receptor (βAR) agonists, dobutamine, and ractopamine (a feed additive that promotes leanness in cattle and poultry), which are the first βAR agonists identified as activators of ERα-mediated gene transcription. This approach can be applied to other receptors implicated in endocrine disruption.

Indexed as

AnimalsChlorocebus aethiopsComputational BiologyCOS CellsEndocrine DisruptorsEstrogen Receptor alphaGreen Chemistry TechnologyHumansLigandsLuciferases, FireflyMolecular Docking SimulationMolecular StructurePlasmidsProtein BindingTranscriptional ActivationTransfectionEndocrine DisruptorsEstrogen Receptor alphaLigandsLuciferases, Fireflybisphenol A (BPA)endocrine disrupting chemicalsestrogen receptor αgreen chemistrymolecular dockingvirtual ligand screening

Identifiers

PMID24928891
PMCPMC4271121
OpenAlexW2141508601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.