Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24928876›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2014

Automated design of probes for rRNA-targeted fluorescence in situ hybridization reveals the advantages of using dual probes for accurate identification.

Erik S Wright, L Safak Yilmaz, Andrew M Corcoran, Hatice E Ökten, Daniel R Noguera

Open access · bronzeAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Bioinformatics Approaches in Noncoding RNAs Research.Experientia supplementum (2012) · 2026
    Review
  7. CLASI-FISH Imaging of Fusobacterium in Oral Microbial Communities.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Advances and Challenges in FluorescenceFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  20. Global biogeography of chemosynthetic symbionts reveals both localized and globally distributed symbiont groups.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Erik S WrightDepartment of Bacteriology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA Systems Biology Theme, Wisconsin Institute for Discovery, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA eswright@wisc.edu.
L Safak YilmazProgram in Systems Biology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA.
Andrew M CorcoranDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Hatice E ÖktenDepartment of Environmental Engineering, Bahcesehir University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Daniel R NogueraDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USBahçeşehir University · TRUniversity of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is a common technique for identifying cells in their natural environment and is often used to complement next-generation sequencing approaches as an integral part of the full-cycle rRNA approach. A major challenge in FISH is the design of oligonucleotide probes with high sensitivity and specificity to their target group. The rapidly expanding number of rRNA sequences has increased awareness of the number of potential nontargets for every FISH probe, making the design of new FISH probes challenging using traditional methods. In this study, we conducted a systematic analysis of published probes that revealed that many have insufficient coverage or specificity for their intended target group. Therefore, we developed an improved thermodynamic model of FISH that can be applied at any taxonomic level, used the model to systematically design probes for all recognized genera of bacteria and archaea, and identified potential cross-hybridizations for the selected probes. This analysis resulted in high-specificity probes for 35.6% of the genera when a single probe was used in the absence of competitor probes and for 60.9% when up to two competitor probes were used. Requiring the hybridization of two independent probes for positive identification further increased specificity. In this case, we could design highly specific probe sets for up to 68.5% of the genera without the use of competitor probes and 87.7% when up to two competitor probes were used. The probes designed in this study, as well as tools for designing new probes, are available online (http://DECIPHER.cee.wisc.edu).

Indexed as

Computers, MolecularAutomationBacteriaDNA, BacterialDNA PrimersDNA ProbesIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceRNA, RibosomalDNA, BacterialDNA PrimersDNA ProbesRNA, Ribosomal

Identifiers

PMID24928876
PMCPMC4135741
OpenAlexW2136693923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.