Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24928762›Full record

ReviewTrends in biochemical sciences2014

Terminate and make a loop: regulation of transcriptional directionality.

Pawel Grzechnik, Sue Mei Tan-Wong, Nick J Proudfoot

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in biochemical sciences, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Molecular models of bidirectional promoter regulation.Current opinion in structural biology · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Critical Involvement of TFIIB in Viral Pathogenesis.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Novel mRNAs 3' end-associatedRNA (New York, N.Y.) · 2019
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The Role of Long Non-Coding RNAs in Hepatocarcinogenesis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Pawel GrzechnikSir William Dunn School of Pathology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3RE, UK.
Sue Mei Tan-WongSir William Dunn School of Pathology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3RE, UK.
Nick J ProudfootSir William Dunn School of Pathology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3RE, UK. Electronic address: nicholas.proudfoot@path.ox.ac.uk.

Funding

European Research Council 339270Wellcome Trust 091805/Z/10/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bidirectional promoters are a common feature of many eukaryotic organisms from yeast to humans. RNA Polymerase II that is recruited to this type of promoter can start transcribing in either direction using alternative DNA strands as the template. Such promiscuous transcription can lead to the synthesis of unwanted transcripts that may have negative effects on gene expression. Recent studies have identified transcription termination and gene looping as critical players in the enforcement of promoter directionality. Interestingly, both mechanisms share key components. Here, we focus on recent findings relating to the transcriptional output of bidirectional promoters.

Indexed as

Gene Expression RegulationRNA Processing, Post-TranscriptionalTranscription Termination, GeneticAnimalsHumansPromoter Regions, GeneticRNA Polymerase IIRNA Polymerase IIbidirectional promotersgene loopstranscriptional termination

Identifiers

PMID24928762
PMCPMC4085477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.