Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24928448›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical informatics2014

Automatic construction of a large-scale and accurate drug-side-effect association knowledge base from biomedical literature.

Rong Xu, QuanQiu Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The SIDER database of drugs and side effects.Nucleic acids research · 2016
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. CD-REST: a system for extracting chemical-induced disease relation in literature.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2016
    Article
  18. Chemical-induced disease relation extraction with various linguistic features.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2016
    Article
  19. A crowdsourcing workflow for extracting chemical-induced disease relations from free text.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2016
    Article
  20. HITSZ_CDR: an end-to-end chemical and disease relation extraction system for BioCreative V.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rong XuMedical Informatics Program, Center for Clinical Investigation, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, United States. Electronic address: rxx@case.edu.
QuanQiu WangThinTek, LLC, Palo Alto, CA 94306, United States. Electronic address: qwang@thintek.com.

Funding

CTSA INFRASTRUCTURE FOR PEDIATRIC RESEARCHUL1RR024989 · NCRR · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI DAVIS, PAMELA B · 2007 to 2011
$53.7M
TRAINING IN COMPUTATIONAL GENOMIC EPIDEMIOLOGY OF CANCERR25CA094186 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI LI, LI · 2002 to 2016
$6.8M
Rapid reverse translational drug repositioningDP2HD084068 · NICHD · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI XU, RONG · 2014 to 2014
$2.4M
NCI NIH HHS R25 CA094186NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024989NICHD NIH HHS DP2 HD084068
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Systems approaches to studying drug-side-effect (drug-SE) associations are emerging as an active research area for drug target discovery, drug repositioning, and drug toxicity prediction. However, currently available drug-SE association databases are far from being complete. Herein, in an effort to increase the data completeness of current drug-SE relationship resources, we present an automatic learning approach to accurately extract drug-SE pairs from the vast amount of published biomedical literature, a rich knowledge source of side effect information for commercial, experimental, and even failed drugs. For the text corpus, we used 119,085,682 MEDLINE sentences and their parse trees. We used known drug-SE associations derived from US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) drug labels as prior knowledge to find relevant sentences and parse trees. We extracted syntactic patterns associated with drug-SE pairs from the resulting set of parse trees. We developed pattern-ranking algorithms to prioritize drug-SE-specific patterns. We then selected a set of patterns with both high precisions and recalls in order to extract drug-SE pairs from the entire MEDLINE. In total, we extracted 38,871 drug-SE pairs from MEDLINE using the learned patterns, the majority of which have not been captured in FDA drug labels to date. On average, our knowledge-driven pattern-learning approach in extracting drug-SE pairs from MEDLINE has achieved a precision of 0.833, a recall of 0.407, and an F1 of 0.545. We compared our approach to a support vector machine (SVM)-based machine learning and a co-occurrence statistics-based approach. We show that the pattern-learning approach is largely complementary to the SVM- and co-occurrence-based approaches with significantly higher precision and F1 but lower recall. We demonstrated by correlation analysis that the extracted drug side effects correlate positively with both drug targets, metabolism, and indications.

Indexed as

Biological OntologiesDatabases, PharmaceuticalNatural Language ProcessingVocabulary, ControlledAdverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsArtificial IntelligenceDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsHumansPeriodicals as TopicReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityDrug discoveryDrug repositioningDrug side effectDrug toxicity predictionText mining

Identifiers

PMID24928448
PMCPMC4589180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.