Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24928338›Full record

Trial reportJournal of negative results in biomedicine2014

Comparison of vilanterol, a novel long-acting beta2 agonist, with placebo and a salmeterol reference arm in asthma uncontrolled by inhaled corticosteroids.

Jan Lötvall, Eric D Bateman, William W Busse, Paul M O'Byrne, Ashley Woodcock, William T Toler, Loretta Jacques, Caroline Goldfrad, Eugene R Bleecker

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of negative results in biomedicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01181895 (A Randomized, Double-blind, Double-dummy, Parallel-group, Placebo Controlled), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01181895 phase3completednot on this map

A Randomized, Double-blind, Double-dummy, Parallel-group, Placebo Controlled (on Inhaled Corticosteroid Medication), Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Vilanterol Inhalation Powder (GW642444) and Salmeterol, Compared With Placebo in the Treatment of Persistent Asthma in Adults and Adolescents Uncontrolled on Inhaled Corticosteroids

TypeinterventionalSponsorGlaxoSmithKlineRan2010 to 2011Enrolled348ConditionsAsthmaArmsVilanterol, Salmeterol Inhalation Powder, Placebo Inhalation Powder NDPI, Placebo Inhalation Powder Diskus
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Vilanterol and fluticasone furoate for asthma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.

Jan LötvallKrefting Research Centre, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden. jan.lotvall@gu.se.
Eric D Bateman
William W Busse
Paul M O'Byrne
Ashley Woodcock
William T Toler
Loretta Jacques
Caroline Goldfrad
Eugene R Bleecker
GlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom) · GBMcMaster University · CAResearch Triangle Park Foundation · USUniversity of Cape Town · ZAUniversity of Gothenburg · SEUniversity of Manchester · GBUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · USWake Forest University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrent maintenance therapies for asthma require twice-daily dosing. Vilanterol (VI) is a novel long-acting beta2 agonist, under development in combination with fluticasone furoate, a new inhaled corticosteroid (ICS). Findings from a previous 4-week study suggested that VI has inherent 24-hour activity and is therefore suitable for once-daily dosing. The study described here was a double-blind, double-dummy, randomised, placebo-controlled trial, the aim of which was to assess the efficacy of once-daily VI compared with placebo in patients with persistent asthma. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in 24-hour weighted mean forced expiratory volume in 1 second after 12 weeks of treatment vs. placebo. An active control arm received salmeterol (SAL) twice daily. All patients were maintained on a stable background dose of ICS.

resultsPatients (n = 347) received VI, placebo or SAL (1:1:1). For the primary endpoint, substantial improvements in lung function were seen with VI (359 ml), SAL (283 ml) and placebo (289 ml). There were no statistically significant treatment differences between either the VI (70 ml, P = 0.244) or SAL (-6 ml, P = 0.926) groups and placebo. Both active treatments were well tolerated, with similarly low rates of treatment-related adverse events compared with placebo. No treatment-related serious adverse events occurred.

conclusionsThis study failed to show a treatment difference between VI and placebo for the primary endpoint, in the presence of a placebo response of unforeseen magnitude. Because the placebo response was so large, it is not possible to draw meaningful conclusions from the data. The reason for this magnitude of effect is unclear but it may reflect increased compliance with the anti-inflammatory therapy regimen during the treatment period.

trial registrationNCT01181895 at ClinicalTrials.gov.

Indexed as

Administration, InhalationAdrenal Cortex HormonesAdrenergic beta-2 Receptor AgonistsAdultAlbuterolAsthmaBenzyl AlcoholsChlorobenzenesDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSalmeterol XinafoateYoung AdultAdrenal Cortex HormonesAdrenergic beta-2 Receptor AgonistsAlbuterolBenzyl AlcoholsChlorobenzenesSalmeterol Xinafoatevilanterol

Identifiers

PMID24928338
PMCPMC4055937
OpenAlexW2140441261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.