Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24928217›Full record

Trial reportBMC public health2014

SLIMMER: a randomised controlled trial of diabetes prevention in Dutch primary health care: design and methods for process, effect, and economic evaluation.

Geerke Duijzer, Annemien Haveman-Nies, Sophia C Jansen, Josien ter Beek, Gerrit J Hiddink, Edith J M Feskens

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC public health, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02094911 (Implementation and), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02094911 naunknown statusnot on this map

Implementation and (Cost-)Effectiveness of Diabetes Prevention in Dutch Primary Health Care: From SLIM to SLIMMER

TypeinterventionalSponsorWageningen UniversityRan2011 to 2015Enrolled316ConditionsDiabetes Mellitus Type 2ArmsCombined lifestyle intervention, Usual care group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Developing a Personalized Integrative Obesity-Coaching Program: A Systems Health Perspective.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Online and Offline Behavior Change Techniques to Promote a Healthy Lifestyle: A Qualitative Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Determinants of lifestyle behavior change to prevent type 2 diabetes in high-risk individuals.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2017
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Geerke DuijzerDivision of Human Nutrition; Academic Collaborative Centre AGORA, Wageningen University, P,O, Box 8129, 6700 VE Wageningen, the Netherlands. geerke.duijzer@wur.nl.
Annemien Haveman-Nies
Sophia C Jansen
Josien ter Beek
Gerrit J Hiddink
Edith J M Feskens
Wageningen University & Research · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImplementation of interventions in real-life settings requires a comprehensive evaluation approach. The aim of this article is to describe the evaluation design of the SLIMMER diabetes prevention intervention in a Dutch real-life setting. METHODS/

designThe SLIMMER study is a randomised, controlled intervention study including subjects aged 40 through 70 years with impaired fasting glucose or high risk of diabetes. The 10-month SLIMMER intervention involves a dietary and physical activity intervention, including case management and a maintenance programme. The control group receives usual health care and written information about a healthy lifestyle. A logic model of change is composed to link intervention activities with intervention outcomes in a logical order. Primary outcome is fasting insulin. Measurements are performed at baseline and after 12 and 18 months and cover quality of life, cardio-metabolic risk factors (e.g. glucose tolerance, serum lipids, body fatness, and blood pressure), eating and physical activity behaviour, and behavioural determinants. A process evaluation gives insight in how the intervention was delivered and received by participants and health care professionals. The economic evaluation consists of a cost-effectiveness analysis and a cost-utility analysis. Costs are assessed from both a societal and health care perspective. DISCUSSION: This study is expected to provide insight in the effectiveness, including its cost-effectiveness, and delivery of the SLIMMER diabetes prevention intervention conducted in Dutch primary health care. Results of this study provide valuable information for primary health care professionals, researchers, and policy makers.

trial registrationThe SLIMMER study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02094911) since March 19, 2014.

Indexed as

Health BehaviorAdultAgedCost-Benefit AnalysisDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2DietExerciseFemaleHealth PromotionHumansLife StyleMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsPrimary Health CareProgram Evaluation

Identifiers

PMID24928217
PMCPMC4067380
OpenAlexW2150358243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.