Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24927074›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Stakeholders' perceptions of integrated community case management by community health workers: a post-intervention qualitative study.

Denise L Buchner, Jennifer L Brenner, Jerome Kabakyenga, Kyomuhangi Teddy, Samuel Maling, Celestine Barigye, Alberto Nettel-Aguirre, Nalini Singhal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Evaluating mobile solutions of integrated Community Case Management (iCCM): Making the final connection.Malawi medical journal : the journal of Medical Association of Malawi · 2017
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Denise L BuchnerFaculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Jennifer L BrennerFaculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Jerome KabakyengaFaculty of Medicine, Mbrara University of Science and Technology, Mbrara District, Mbrara, Uganda.
Kyomuhangi TeddyHealthy Child Uganda, Mbrara District, Mbrara, Uganda.
Samuel MalingFaculty of Medicine, Mbrara University of Science and Technology, Mbrara District, Mbrara, Uganda.
Celestine BarigyeMinistry of Health, Government of Uganda, Kampala, Uganda.
Alberto Nettel-AguirreFaculty of Medicine, Mbrara University of Science and Technology, Mbrara District, Mbrara, Uganda.
Nalini SinghalFaculty of Medicine, Mbrara University of Science and Technology, Mbrara District, Mbrara, Uganda.

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntegrated community case management (iCCM) involves delivery of simple medicines to children with pneumonia, diarrhea and/or malaria by community health workers (CHWs). Between 2010 and 2012, an iCCM intervention trial was implemented by Healthy Child Uganda. This study used qualitative tools to assess whether project stakeholders perceived that iCCM improved access to care for children under five years of age.

methodsThe intervention involved training and equipping 196 CHWs in 98 study villages in one sub-county in Uganda in iCCM. During the eight-month intervention, CHWs assessed sick children, provided antimalarials (coartem) for fever, antibiotics (amoxicillin) for cough and fast breathing, oral rehydration salts/zinc for diarrhea, and referred very sick children to health facilities. In order to examine community perceptions and acceptability of iCCM, post-intervention focus groups and key respondent interviews involving caregivers, health workers, CHWs and local leaders were carried out by experienced facilitators using semi-structured interview guides. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis techniques.

resultsRespondents reported increased access to health care for children as a result of iCCM. Access was reportedly closer to home, available more hours in a day, and the availability of CHWs was perceived as more reliable. CHW care was reported to be trustworthy and caring. Families reported saving money especially due to reduced transportation costs, and less time away from home. Respondents also perceived better health outcomes. Linkages between health facilities and communities were reportedly improved by the iCCM intervention due to the presence of trained CHWs in the community.

conclusionsiCCM delivered by CHWs may improve access to health care and is acceptable to families. Policymakers should continue to seek opportunities to implement and support iCCM, particularly in remote communities where there are health worker shortages.

Indexed as

Case ManagementChildCommunity Health ServicesCommunity Health WorkersDiarrheaEvaluation Studies as TopicFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMalariaMalePneumoniaRural PopulationUganda

Identifiers

PMID24927074
PMCPMC4057118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.