Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24926741›Full record

ReviewStem cells and development2014

Sca-1+ cardiac progenitor cells and heart-making: a critical synopsis.

Mariana Valente, Diana Santos Nascimento, Ana Cumano, Perpétua Pinto-do-Ó

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Stem cells and development, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Pathogenesis of Cardiac Fibrosis: A Review of Recent Progress.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Conventional and Emerging Markers in Stem Cell Isolation and Characterization.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics · 2019
    Article
  18. Cardiac Sca-1Circulation · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Sca-1European journal of immunology · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mariana Valente1 Stem-Cell Microenvironments in Repair/Regeneration Team, Microenvironments for NewTherapies Group, INEB-Instituto Nacional de Engenharia Biomédica, Universidade do Porto , Porto, Portugal .
Diana Santos Nascimento
Ana Cumano
Perpétua Pinto-do-Ó

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The identification, in the adult, of cardiomyocyte turnover events and of cardiac progenitor cells (CPCs) has revolutionized the field of cardiovascular medicine. However, the low rate of CPCs differentiation events reported both in vitro and in vivo, even after injury, raised concerns on the biological significance of these subsets. In this Comprehensive Review, we discuss the current understanding of cardiac Lin(-)Sca-1(+) cells in light of what is also known for cellular compartments with similar phenotypes in other organs. The Lin(-)Sca-1(+) heart subset is heterogeneous and displays a mesenchymal profile, characterized by a limited ability to generate cardiomyocytes in vitro and in vivo, even after injury. There is no evidence for Sca-1 expression in embryonic cardiovascular progenitors. In other organs, Sca-1 expression is mainly observed on mesoderm-derived cells, although it is not restricted to stem/progenitor cell populations. It is urgent to determine, at a single cell level, to which extent cardiac Lin(-)Sca-1(+) cells overlap with the fibroblast compartment.

Indexed as

HeartAnimalsAntigens, LyCell DifferentiationHumansMyocytes, CardiacStem CellsAntigens, Ly

Identifiers

PMID24926741
PMCPMC4172562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.