Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24925910›Full record

ArticleScience (New York, N.Y.)2014

Feedback control of chromosome separation by a midzone Aurora B gradient.

Olga Afonso, Irina Matos, António J Pereira, Paulo Aguiar, Michael A Lampson, Helder Maiato

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science (New York, N.Y.), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed, 127 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Flow, sense and divide.Nature cell biology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Double-checking chromosome segregation.The Journal of cell biology · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Aurora kinases: Generators of spatial control during mitosis.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Genome instability from nuclear catastrophe and DNA damage.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Dephosphorylation in nuclear reassembly after mitosis.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  20. Cell Cycle Progression and Synchronization: An Overview.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Review

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Olga Afonso *Chromosome Instability and Dynamics Laboratory, Instituto de Biologia Molecular e Celular, Universidade do Porto, Rua do Campo Alegre 823, 4150-180 Porto, Portugal.
Irina Matos *Chromosome Instability and Dynamics Laboratory, Instituto de Biologia Molecular e Celular, Universidade do Porto, Rua do Campo Alegre 823, 4150-180 Porto, Portugal.
António J PereiraChromosome Instability and Dynamics Laboratory, Instituto de Biologia Molecular e Celular, Universidade do Porto, Rua do Campo Alegre 823, 4150-180 Porto, Portugal.
Paulo AguiarChromosome Instability and Dynamics Laboratory, Instituto de Biologia Molecular e Celular, Universidade do Porto, Rua do Campo Alegre 823, 4150-180 Porto, Portugal.
Michael A LampsonDepartment of Biology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Helder MaiatoChromosome Instability and Dynamics Laboratory, Instituto de Biologia Molecular e Celular, Universidade do Porto, Rua do Campo Alegre 823, 4150-180 Porto, Portugal.
Universidade do Porto · PTUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Regulation of cell division by mitotic kinasesR01GM083988 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI GRISHCHUK, EKATERINA L, LAMPSON, MICHAEL · 2008 to 2017
$3.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM083988
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate chromosome segregation during mitosis requires the physical separation of sister chromatids before nuclear envelope reassembly (NER). However, how these two processes are coordinated remains unknown. Here, we identified a conserved feedback control mechanism that delays chromosome decondensation and NER in response to incomplete chromosome separation during anaphase. A midzone-associated Aurora B gradient was found to monitor chromosome position along the division axis and to prevent premature chromosome decondensation by retaining Condensin I. PP1/PP2A phosphatases counteracted this gradient and promoted chromosome decondensation and NER. Thus, an Aurora B gradient appears to mediate a surveillance mechanism that prevents chromosome decondensation and NER until effective separation of sister chromatids is achieved. This allows the correction and reintegration of lagging chromosomes in the main nuclei before completion of NER.

Indexed as

AnaphaseFeedback, PhysiologicalAnimalsAurora Kinase BCell LineCell Line, TumorChromosome SegregationDrosophilaHumansNuclear EnvelopeProtein Phosphatase 1Protein Phosphatase 2AURKB protein, humanAurora Kinase BProtein Phosphatase 1Protein Phosphatase 2

Identifiers

PMID24925910
PMCPMC5240038
OpenAlexW2011907448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.