Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24925627›Full record

ArticlePerspectives on medical education2014

What would happen to education if we take education evidence seriously?

C P M van der Vleuten, E W Driessen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Perspectives on medical education, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Looking back to look forward: Learning from past innovations in family medicine training.South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Longitudinal integrated clerkships from start to finish: A medical curriculum innovation.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Pyramids in medical education: Their conceptualization and utility summarizedRevista colombiana de obstetricia y ginecologia · 2023
    Article
  13. The art and science of clinical pediatric education.European journal of pediatrics · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

C P M van der VleutenDepartment of Educational Development and Research, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, the Netherlands. c.vandervleuten@maastrichtuniversity.nl.
E W DriessenDepartment of Educational Development and Research, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Educational practice and educational research are not aligned with each other. Current educational practice heavily relies on information transmission or content delivery to learners. Yet evidence shows that delivery is only a minor part of learning. To illustrate the directions we might take to find better educational strategies, six areas of educational evidence are briefly reviewed. The flipped classroom idea is proposed to shift our expenditure and focus in education. All information delivery could be web distributed, thus creating more time for other more expensive educational strategies to support the learner. In research our focus should shift from comparing one curriculum to the other, to research that explains why things work in education and under which conditions. This may generate ideas for creative designers to develop new educational strategies. These best practices should be shared and further researched. At the same time attention should be paid to implementation and the realization that teachers learn in a way very similar to the people they teach. If we take the evidence seriously, our educational practice will look quite different to the way it does now.

Identifiers

PMID24925627
PMCPMC4078056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.