ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2015
Estimation of sagittal pelvic orientation from frontal standard radiograph using the sacral-femoral-pubic angle: feasibility study in the pediatric population.
Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The role of pelvic coronal parameters in determining sagittal balance: a prospective radiographic analysis of pelvic spinopelvic alignment in Chinese asymptomatic Han adolescents.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
- Assessment of the Relationship between Pelvic Tilt and the Sacro-Femoral-Pubic Angle in Middle-Aged and Elderly Asian Individuals.Asian spine journal · 2017Article
- Evaluation of demographic factors affecting predictability of the sacro-femoral-pubic angle in healthy adolescents.Journal of anatomy · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePelvic tilt is usually measured on a full spine sagittal view. The sacral-femoral-pubic angle (SFP) has been previously described as a reproducible method to estimate pelvic tilt on a pelvis AP view. The aim of our study is to determine the reliability of the extrapolated pelvic tilt (ePT) using the SFP angle in the pediatric population.
methodsWe selected 240 full spine X-rays in our pediatric imaging database. The cohort was equally distributed according gender and age. The following parameters were measured: SFP angle on the AP view, pelvic tilt (PT), pelvic incidence (PI) and sacral slope (SS) on the sagittal view. Concordance between the measured pelvic tilt (mPT) and the calculated (ePT) value of PT was tested by a correlation test. Intra- and inter-observer reliability was tested for each parameter using ANOVA.
resultsOur cohort included 240 children aged from 1 to 20 years (mean age 10.7 years). Mean SFP angle was 68.98° ± 6.8, mPT was 6.67° ± 8.56, ePT was 6.04° ± 6.79. The mean PI (45.04° ± 11.09) and SS (38.63° ± 8.12) were comparable to previously published pediatric data according to age groups. Intra- and inter-observer reliability showed acceptable correlation. Concordance between mPT and ePT was higher in older children (patients >10 years).
conclusionsEstimated value of pelvic tilt using the SFP angle showed acceptable correlation to the pelvic tilt measured on sagittal view of the pelvis in children over 10 years. However, correlation rates were lower than previous publication in adult population. This simple method could accurately estimate the pelvic orientation on a single frontal view of the pelvis, which may be of particular interest in understanding the relationship between pelvic orientation and hip pathology. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24925286What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.