Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24925083›Full record

ArticleClinical trials (London, England)2014

Inference about the expected performance of a data-driven dynamic treatment regime.

Bibhas Chakraborty, Eric B Laber, Ying-Qi Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical trials (London, England), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Deeply Tailored Adaptive Interventions to Reduce College Student Drinking: a Real-World Application of Q-Learning for SMART Studies.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2022
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Optimal individualized decision rules using instrumental variable methods.Journal of the American Statistical Association · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Precision Medicine.Annual review of statistics and its application · 2019
    Article
  8. Evaluating the impact of treating the optimal subgroup.Statistical methods in medical research · 2017
    Observational
  9. Article
  10. Optimal Individualized Treatments in Resource-Limited Settings.The international journal of biostatistics · 2016
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Comment.Journal of the American Statistical Association · 2016
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bibhas ChakrabortyCentre for Quantitative Medicine, Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore, Singapore Department of Biostatistics, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA bibhas.chakraborty@duke-nus.edu.sg.
Eric B LaberDepartment of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.
Ying-Qi ZhaoDepartment of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.

Funding

Statistical Methods for Cancer Clinical TrialsP01CA142538 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI DAVIDIAN, MARIE, KOSOROK, MICHAEL R · 2010 to 2019
$21.3M
Developing Optimal Dynamic Behavioral Intervention in Community-Based Studies.R01NS072127 · NINDS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI CHEUNG, KEN · 2011 to 2013
$835k
From Bench to Bedside to Community:Statistical Issues in the Early to Late AssessR13CA132565 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI ELLENBERG, JONAS H · 2008 to 2013
$167k
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA142538NCI NIH HHS R13 CA132565NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS072127
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA dynamic treatment regime (DTR) comprises a sequence of decision rules, one per stage of intervention, that recommends how to individualize treatment to patients based on evolving treatment and covariate history. These regimes are useful for managing chronic disorders, and fit into the larger paradigm of personalized medicine. The Value of a DTR is the expected outcome when the DTR is used to assign treatments to a population of interest. PURPOSE: The Value of a data-driven DTR, estimated using data from a Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial, is both a data-dependent parameter and a non-smooth function of the underlying generative distribution. These features introduce additional variability that is not accounted for by standard methods for conducting statistical inference, for example, the bootstrap or normal approximations, if applied without adjustment. Our purpose is to provide a feasible method for constructing valid confidence intervals (CIs) for this quantity of practical interest.

methodsWe propose a conceptually simple and computationally feasible method for constructing valid CIs for the Value of an estimated DTR based on subsampling. The method is self-tuning by virtue of an approach called the double bootstrap. We demonstrate the proposed method using a series of simulated experiments.

resultsThe proposed method offers considerable improvement in terms of coverage rates of the CIs over the standard bootstrap approach. LIMITATIONS: In this article, we have restricted our attention to Q-learning for estimating the optimal DTR. However, other methods can be employed for this purpose; to keep the discussion focused, we have not explored these alternatives.

conclusionSubsampling-based CIs provide much better performance compared to standard bootstrap for the Value of an estimated DTR.

Identifiers

PMID24925083
PMCPMC4265005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.