ArticleHerz2015
Effects of renal sympathetic denervation and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor on left ventricular hypertrophy. Comparison in spontaneously hypertensive rats.
Article in Herz, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Effects of Renal Nerve Denervation on Blood Pressure and Target Organs in Different Hypertensive Rat Models.International journal of hypertension · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe aim of this study was to investigate whether renal sympathetic denervation (RSD) is more effective on myocardial hypertrophy than the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) perindopril in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRs).
methodsAfter bilateral renal denervation blood pressure (BP) was measured every 10 days. On day 50 the heart was (histo)pathologically examined. The ventricular weight to body weight ratios (VW/BW), myocardial diameter and collagen volume fraction (CVF) were calculated, and cardiac hypertrophy marker genes were analyzed by RT-PCR.
resultsAt the baseline evaluation all groups had comparable BP. After treatment the BP of the RSD group was significantly reduced (p < 0.05). The BP of the RSD group was lower than that of the perindopril group on days 10, 20 and 30th (p < 0.05) but on day 50 systolic BP of the RSD group was significantly higher (p < 0.05) whereas there were no significant differences in diastolic BP. The VW/BW decreased in the RSD group, whereas the value did not change significantly in the perindopril group. The myocardial diameter of the left ventricular cardiomyocytes was also significantly lower in the RSD group and stayed the same in the perindopril group. Collagen volume fraction (CVF) in the RSD group was significantly lower than in the perindopril group (p < 0.05). Significant changes in the expression levels of NPPA, MYH7, and MYH6 (P < 0.05) were observed in the RD-SHR groups (p < 0.05). There was a significant difference in the expression level of MYH6 (p < 0.05) between the RSD group and the perindopril group but the expression levels of NPPA and MYH7 were not significantly different.
conclusionIn this study, RSD had a significant antihypertensive effect and inhibited hypertensive-induced cardiac hypertrophy in SHRs and showed advantages compared with ACEI in decreasing BP in the early stage and in inhibiting myocardial fibrosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.