Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24924262›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of public health2015

Living with diabetes and hypertension in Tunisia: popular perspectives on biomedical treatment.

Faten Tlili, Francine Tinsa, Afef Skhiri, Shahaduz Zaman, Peter Phillimore, Habiba Ben Romdhane

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of public health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Faten TliliCVD Epidemiology and Prevention Research Laboratory (CAVEPLA), Faculté de Médecine de Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia, faten.tlili@ymail.com.
Francine Tinsa
Afef Skhiri
Shahaduz Zaman
Peter Phillimore
Habiba Ben Romdhane

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe growing prevalence of non-communicable diseases across the Middle East and North Africa poses major challenges for underfunded health services. This article presents data on the perspectives of ordinary Tunisians who are coping with two of these diseases--diabetes and hypertension--and who are obtaining treatment through Tunisian public health clinics. Little has been written to date on patient experiences of biomedical treatment in Maghreb countries.

methodsBased on qualitative methods and semi-structured interviews with 24 patients attending two clinics, one urban and one rural.

resultsWe examine popular aetiological beliefs, ideas about biomedical treatment and its implications, and comparative views on the benefits and drawbacks of treatment in both public and private clinics.

conclusionsWe highlight two main themes. One was nostalgia for a recent past when 'pure' and 'natural' food, 'proper' meals and less stressful lives meant less chronic illness, with demanding and costly treatment. The other concerned communication in the clinic, and the recurrent dismay patients felt at what they saw as the cursory attention and guidance they received from clinic staff in public facilities.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAgedAmbulatory Care FacilitiesDiabetes MellitusDietFemaleHumansHypertensionMaleMiddle AgedPerceptionResidence CharacteristicsStress, PsychologicalTunisia

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.