Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24923936›Full record

ArticleBritish dental journal2014

Minimal intervention dentistry in the management of the paediatric patient.

S C Leal

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in British dental journal, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03144284 (Assessment of Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice of Minimal Intervention Dentistry in a Group of Dental Interns in Egypt), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03144284 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Assessment of Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice of Minimal Intervention Dentistry in a Group of Dental Interns in Egypt: A Cross-sectional Study

TypeobservationalSponsorCairo UniversityRan2017 to 2018Enrolled200ConditionsPediatric DentistryArmsKnowledge, attitude, and practice survey
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Restorative thresholds for carious lesions in primary molars: French dentist's decisions.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

S C LealDepartment of Dentistry, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Brasília, Campus Darcy Ribeiro, Asa Norte, Barsília - DF, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Minimal intervention dentistry (MID) is a philosophy of care that aims to conserve tooth tissues throughout a persons' life. This paper aims to review the literature on topics that are related to MID approaches for the management of dental caries and that can be applicable to the paediatric patient. Tools for caries diagnosis and early lesion detection are presented and discussed. More conservative and less invasive techniques for managing enamel and dentine carious lesions in primary and permanent teeth are compared to the traditional treatments. The traditional treatments are centred on the disease and on restoring its sequels, and have been shown to be insufficiently effective in controlling caries disease over time. In contrast, the MID philosophy has created potentially very suitable options for treating children that are considered more child-friendly, less anxiety provoking, preserve more tooth tissues and are equally good as the traditional treatments.

Indexed as

ChildDental CariesHumansPit and Fissure SealantsPit and Fissure Sealants

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.