Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24923820›Full record

ArticleDatabase : the journal of biological databases and curation2014

Egas: a collaborative and interactive document curation platform.

David Campos, Jóni Lourenço, Sérgio Matos, José Luís Oliveira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Database : the journal of biological databases and curation, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A semantic-based workflow for biomedical literature annotation.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2017
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Gold-standard ontology-based anatomical annotation in the CRAFT Corpus.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2017
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Overview of the interactive task in BioCreative V.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2016
    Article
  12. BioC viewer: a web-based tool for displaying and merging annotations in BioC.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2016
    Article
  13. Mining clinical attributes of genomic variants through assisted literature curation in Egas.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

David CamposBMD Software, Lda., Rua Calouste Gulbenkian n. 1, 3810-074 Aveiro, Portugal and IEETA/DETI, Campus Universitário de Santiago, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal david.campos@bmd-software.com.
Jóni LourençoBMD Software, Lda., Rua Calouste Gulbenkian n. 1, 3810-074 Aveiro, Portugal and IEETA/DETI, Campus Universitário de Santiago, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal.
Sérgio MatosBMD Software, Lda., Rua Calouste Gulbenkian n. 1, 3810-074 Aveiro, Portugal and IEETA/DETI, Campus Universitário de Santiago, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal.
José Luís OliveiraBMD Software, Lda., Rua Calouste Gulbenkian n. 1, 3810-074 Aveiro, Portugal and IEETA/DETI, Campus Universitário de Santiago, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the overwhelming amount of biomedical textual information being produced, several manual curation efforts have been set up to extract and store concepts and their relationships into structured resources. As manual annotation is a demanding and expensive task, computerized solutions were developed to perform such tasks automatically. However, high-end information extraction techniques are still not widely used by biomedical research communities, mainly because of the lack of standards and limitations in usability. Interactive annotation tools intend to fill this gap, taking advantage of automatic techniques and existing knowledge bases to assist expert curators in their daily tasks. This article presents Egas, a web-based platform for biomedical text mining and assisted curation with highly usable interfaces for manual and automatic in-line annotation of concepts and relations. A comprehensive set of de facto standard knowledge bases are integrated and indexed to provide straightforward concept normalization features. Real-time collaboration and conversation functionalities allow discussing details of the annotation task as well as providing instant feedback of curator's interactions. Egas also provides interfaces for on-demand management of the annotation task settings and guidelines, and supports standard formats and literature services to import and export documents. By taking advantage of Egas, we participated in the BioCreative IV interactive annotation task, targeting the assisted identification of protein-protein interactions described in PubMed abstracts related to neuropathological disorders. When evaluated by expert curators, it obtained positive scores in terms of usability, reliability and performance. These results, together with the provided innovative features, place Egas as a state-of-the-art solution for fast and accurate curation of information, facilitating the task of creating and updating knowledge bases and annotated resources. Database URL: http://bioinformatics.ua.pt/egas.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorDocumentationSoftwareUser-Computer InterfaceData MiningMolecular Sequence AnnotationPubMed

Identifiers

PMID24923820
PMCPMC4207226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.