Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24923682›Full record

ReviewMinerva anestesiologica2015

Measuring and predicting long-term outcomes in older survivors of critical illness.

M R Baldwin

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Minerva anestesiologica, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Health-related quality of life dynamics: modeling insights from immunotherapy.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Post-intensive Care Syndrome.Annals of geriatric medicine and research · 2021
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Aging and Post-Intensive Care Syndrome: A Critical Need for Geriatric Psychiatry.The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry · 2018
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

M R BaldwinDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA - mrb45@columbia.edu.
Columbia University Irving Medical Center · US

Funding

Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR001874 · NCATS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI GENKINGER, JEANINE M., SHIMBO, DAICHI · 2016 to 2025
$13.6M
Clinical and Translational Science AwardKL2TR000081 · NCATS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI GINSBERG, HENRY N · 2012 to 2015
$3.3M
Frailty, Palliative Care Needs, and Outcomes in Older Survivors of Critical IllneK23AG045560 · NIA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI BALDWIN, MATTHEW R · 2014 to 2018
$750k
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000081NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001874NIA NIH HHS K23 AG045560NIA NIH HHS L30 AG040838
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Older adults (age ≥65 years) now initially survive what were previously fatal critical illnesses, but long-term mortality and disability after critical illness remain high. Most studies show that the majority of deaths among older ICU survivors occur during the first 6 to 12 months after hospital discharge. Less is known about the relationship between critical illness and subsequent cause of death, but longitudinal studies of ICU survivors of pneumonia, stroke, and those who require prolonged mechanical ventilation suggest that many debilitated older ICU survivors die from recurrent infections and sepsis. Recent studies of older ICU survivors have created a new standard for longitudinal critical care outcomes studies with a systematic evaluation of pre-critical illness comorbidities and disability and detailed assessments of physical and cognitive function after hospital discharge. These studies show that after controlling for pre-morbid health, older ICU survivors experience large and persistent declines in cognitive and physical function after critical illness. Long-term health-related quality-of-life studies suggest that some older ICU survivors may accommodate to a degree of physical disability and still report good emotional and social well-being, but these studies are subject to survivorship and proxy-response bias. In order to risk-stratify older ICU survivors for long-term (6-12 months) outcomes, we will need a paradigm shift in the timing and type of predictors measured. Emerging literature suggests that the initial acuity of critical illness will be less important, whereas prehospitalization estimates of disability and frailty, and, in particular, measures of comorbidity, frailty, and disability near the time of hospital discharge will be essential in creating reliable long-term risk-prediction models.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overCritical IllnessHumansPredictive Value of TestsQuality of LifeSurvivorsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID24923682
PMCPMC4375061
OpenAlexW1699209011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.