ArticlePloS one2014
The bias associated with amplicon sequencing does not affect the quantitative assessment of bacterial community dynamics.
Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.
- Variation of gene ratios in mock communities constructed with purified 16S rRNA during processing.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- The developing pig respiratory microbiome harbors strains antagonistic to common respiratory pathogens.mSystems · 2024Article
- Spatial and Seasonal Variations in the Bacterial Community of an Anthropogenic Impacted Urban Stream.Microbial ecology · 2023Article
- Two New Species of Filamentous Sulfur Bacteria of the GenusMicroorganisms · 2022Article
- Model-driven approach for the production of butyrate from COFrontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Accessing Dietary Effects on the Rumen Microbiome: Different Sequencing Methods Tell Different Stories.Veterinary sciences · 2021Article
- Microbiome Community Structure and Functional Gene Partitioning in Different Micro-Niches Within a Sporocarp-Forming Fungus.Frontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
- Termite Societies Promote the Taxonomic and Functional Diversity of Archaeal Communities in Mound Soils.Biology · 2020Article
- Article
- Acute changes in the colonic microbiota are associated with large intestinal forms of surgical colic.BMC veterinary research · 2019Article
- Time Series Genome-Centric Analysis Unveils Bacterial Response to Operational Disturbance in Activated Sludge.mSystems · 2019Article
- 16S rRNA Gene Amplicon Based Metagenomic Signatures of Rhizobiome Community in Rice Field During Various Growth Stages.Frontiers in microbiology · 2019Article
- Counting with DNA in metabarcoding studies: How should we convert sequence reads to dietary data?Molecular ecology · 2019Article
- Variation in faecal microbiota in a group of horses managed at pasture over a 12-month period.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- A comparison of sequencing platforms and bioinformatics pipelines for compositional analysis of the gut microbiome.BMC microbiology · 2017Article
- Characterization of Gastric Microbiota in Twins.Current microbiology · 2017Article
- Shotgun Metagenomic Profiles Have a High Capacity To Discriminate Samples of Activated Sludge According to Wastewater Type.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2016Article
- A comprehensive method for amplicon-based and metagenomic characterization of viruses, bacteria, and eukaryotes in freshwater samples.Microbiome · 2016Article
- Experimental design considerations in microbiota/inflammation studies.Clinical & translational immunology · 2016Review
- Performance comparison of Illumina and ion torrent next-generation sequencing platforms for 16S rRNA-based bacterial community profiling.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The performance of two sets of primers targeting variable regions of the 16S rRNA gene V1-V3 and V4 was compared in their ability to describe changes of bacterial diversity and temporal turnover in full-scale activated sludge. Duplicate sets of high-throughput amplicon sequencing data of the two 16S rRNA regions shared a collection of core taxa that were observed across a series of twelve monthly samples, although the relative abundance of each taxon was substantially different between regions. A case in point was the changes in the relative abundance of filamentous bacteria Thiothrix, which caused a large effect on diversity indices, but only in the V1-V3 data set. Yet the relative abundance of Thiothrix in the amplicon sequencing data from both regions correlated with the estimation of its abundance determined using fluorescence in situ hybridization. In nonmetric multidimensional analysis samples were distributed along the first ordination axis according to the sequenced region rather than according to sample identities. The dynamics of microbial communities indicated that V1-V3 and the V4 regions of the 16S rRNA gene yielded comparable patterns of: 1) the changes occurring within the communities along fixed time intervals, 2) the slow turnover of activated sludge communities and 3) the rate of species replacement calculated from the taxa-time relationships. The temperature was the only operational variable that showed significant correlation with the composition of bacterial communities over time for the sets of data obtained with both pairs of primers. In conclusion, we show that despite the bias introduced by amplicon sequencing, the variable regions V1-V3 and V4 can be confidently used for the quantitative assessment of bacterial community dynamics, and provide a proper qualitative account of general taxa in the community, especially when the data are obtained over a convenient time window rather than at a single time point.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.