Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24923651›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2014

Synchrony and motor mimicking in chimpanzee observational learning.

Delia Fuhrmann, Andrea Ravignani, Sarah Marshall-Pescini, Andrew Whiten

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
10.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Core systems of music perception.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Tuning in to real-time social interactions in macaques.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Measuring rhythms of vocal interactions: a proof of principle in harbour seal pups.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Modelling Animal Interactive Rhythms in Communication.Evolutionary bioinformatics online · 2019
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Synchronized practice helps bearded capuchin monkeys learn to extend attention while learning a tradition.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Delia Fuhrmann1] Centre for Social Learning and Cognitive Evolution, School of Psychology & Neuroscience, University of St Andrews, KY16 9JP, St Andrews, Scotland [2] Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Division of Psychology and Language Science, University College London, WCIN 3AR, London, England.
Andrea RavignaniDepartment of Cognitive Biology, University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Sarah Marshall-Pescini1] Centre for Social Learning and Cognitive Evolution, School of Psychology & Neuroscience, University of St Andrews, KY16 9JP, St Andrews, Scotland [2] Comparative Cognition, Messerli Research Institute, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Andrew WhitenCentre for Social Learning and Cognitive Evolution, School of Psychology & Neuroscience, University of St Andrews, KY16 9JP, St Andrews, Scotland.
University of St Andrews · GBUniversity of Veterinary Medicine Vienna · ATUniversity of Vienna · AT

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council S16447European Research Council 230604
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cumulative tool-based culture underwrote our species' evolutionary success, and tool-based nut-cracking is one of the strongest candidates for cultural transmission in our closest relatives, chimpanzees. However the social learning processes that may explain both the similarities and differences between the species remain unclear. A previous study of nut-cracking by initially naïve chimpanzees suggested that a learning chimpanzee holding no hammer nevertheless replicated hammering actions it witnessed. This observation has potentially important implications for the nature of the social learning processes and underlying motor coding involved. In the present study, model and observer actions were quantified frame-by-frame and analysed with stringent statistical methods, demonstrating synchrony between the observer's and model's movements, cross-correlation of these movements above chance level and a unidirectional transmission process from model to observer. These results provide the first quantitative evidence for motor mimicking underlain by motor coding in apes, with implications for mirror neuron function.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiological EvolutionFemaleHumansImitative BehaviorLearningMaleMonte Carlo MethodMotor SkillsPan troglodytesTool Use BehaviorVideotape Recording

Identifiers

PMID24923651
PMCPMC5381545
OpenAlexW2000535292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.