Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24922280›Full record

ArticleGM crops & food

Populational survey of arthropods on transgenic common bean expressing the rep gene from Bean golden mosaic virus.

Patrícia V Pinheiro, Eliane D Quintela, Ana Maria R Junqueira, Francisco J L Aragão, Josias C Faria

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GM crops & food. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Patrícia V PinheiroEmbrapa Arroz e Feijão; Santo Antônio de Goiás; Goiás, Brazil.
Eliane D QuintelaEmbrapa Arroz e Feijão; Santo Antônio de Goiás; Goiás, Brazil.
Ana Maria R JunqueiraUniversidade de Brasília; Brasília, DF, Brazil.
Francisco J L AragãoEmbrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia; Brasília, DF, Brazil.
Josias C FariaEmbrapa Arroz e Feijão; Santo Antônio de Goiás; Goiás, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetically modified (GM) crops is considered the fastest adopted crop technology in the history of modern agriculture. However, possible undesirable and unintended effects must be considered during the research steps toward development of a commercial product. In this report we evaluated effects of a common bean virus resistant line on arthropod populations, considered as non-target organisms. This GM bean line (named M1/4) was modified for resistance against Bean golden mosaic virus (BGMV) by expressing a mutated REP protein, which is essential for virus replication. Biosafety studies were performed for a period of three years under field conditions. The abundance of some species was significantly higher in specific treatments in a particular year, but not consistently different in other years. A regular pattern was not observed in the distribution of insects between genetically modified and conventional treatments. Data analyses showed that minor differences observed can be attributed to random variation and were not consistent enough to conclude that the treatments were different. Therefore the present study indicates that the relative abundance of species are similar in transgenic and non-transgenic fields.

Indexed as

Pest Control, BiologicalAnimalsArthropodsBiodiversityHerbivoryPhaseolusPlants, Genetically ModifiedPlant VirusesBGMVdry beanenvironmental risk assessmentnon-target organismstransgenic plantvirus resistance

Identifiers

PMID24922280
PMCPMC5033230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.