Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24922171›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of public health2014

Women's health and the Affordable Care Act: high hopes versus harsh realities?

Kelli Stidham Hall, A Mark Fendrick, Melissa Zochowski, Vanessa K Dalton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of public health, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Women's Contraceptive Preference-Use Mismatch.Journal of women's health (2002) · 2017
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. U.S. Women's Intended Sources for Reproductive Health Care.Journal of women's health (2002) · 2016
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Well-woman Care Barriers and Facilitators of Low-income Women Obtaining Induced Abortion after the Affordable Care Act.Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kelli Stidham HallKelli Stidham Hall is with the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and the Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. A. Mark Fendrick is with the Department of Internal Medicine and the Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan. Melissa Zochowski is with the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan. Vanessa K. Dalton is with the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Program on Women's Health Care Effectiveness Research and the Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan.
A Mark Fendrick
Melissa Zochowski
Vanessa K Dalton

Funding

Michigan BIRCWH Career Development ProgramK12HD001438 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI JOHNSON, TIMOTHY RB · 2000 to 2014
$6.7M
NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD001438NICHD NIH HHS K12HD001438
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our population-based survey of 1078 randomly sampled US women, aged 18 to 55 years, sought to characterize their understanding of and attitudes toward the Affordable Care Act (ACA). Most women, especially socially disadvantaged groups, had negative or uncertain attitudes toward the ACA and limited understanding of its health benefits, including its relevance for their own health service coverage and utilization. Our findings are important for continued research, policy, and practice, with implications for whether, when, and how improved coverage will translate to improved access and outcomes for US women.

Indexed as

Patient Protection and Affordable Care ActWomen's HealthAdolescentAdultAttitude to HealthCross-Sectional StudiesData CollectionFemaleHumansMiddle AgedUnited StatesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID24922171
PMCPMC4103253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.