Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24922122›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of public health2014

The case for improving the health of ex-prisoners.

Stuart A Kinner, Emily A Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of public health, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Australia's research investment in the health of justice-involved populations.Australian health review : a publication of the Australian Hospital Association · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Health and incarceration research in Australia: a scoping review.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Cancer equity for those impacted by mass incarceration.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Stuart A KinnerStuart A. Kinner is with the Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, VIC, Australia, and the School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia. Emily A. Wang is with the Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT.
Emily A Wang

Funding

Improving Cardiovascular Outcomes in Individuals with a History of IncarcerationK23HL103720 · NHLBI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI WANG, EMILY AI-HUA · 2010 to 2014
$692k
NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL103720
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The global prison population exceeds 10 million and continues to grow; more than 30 million people are released from custody annually. These individuals are disproportionately poor, disenfranchised, and chronically ill. There are compelling, evidence-based arguments for improving health outcomes for ex-prisoners on human rights, public health, criminal justice, and economic grounds. These arguments stand in stark contrast to current policy and practice in most settings. There is also a dearth of evidence to guide clinicians and policymakers on how best to care for this large and growing population during and after their transition from custody to community. Well-designed longitudinal studies, clinical trials, and burden of disease studies are pivotal to closing this evidence gap.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CarePrisonersGlobal HealthHealth StatusHuman RightsHumansPublic HealthSafety

Identifiers

PMID24922122
PMCPMC4103236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.