Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24922058›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2014

Comparison of REST cistromes across human cell types reveals common and context-specific functions.

Shira Rockowitz, Wen-Hui Lien, Erika Pedrosa, Gang Wei, Mingyan Lin, Keji Zhao, Herbert M Lachman, Elaine Fuchs, Deyou Zheng

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. The Genome-Wide Binding Profile for Human RE1 Silencing Transcription Factor Unveils a Unique Genetic Circuitry in Hippocampus.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Shira RockowitzDepartment of Genetics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, New York, United States of America.
Wen-Hui LienHoward Hughes Medical Institute, Laboratory of Mammalian Cell Biology & Development, The Rockefeller University, New York, New York, United States of America.
Erika PedrosaDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, New York, United States of America.
Gang WeiSystems Biology Center, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institute of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
Mingyan LinDepartment of Genetics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, New York, United States of America.
Keji ZhaoSystems Biology Center, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institute of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
Herbert M LachmanDepartment of Genetics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, New York, United States of America; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, New York, United States of America; Department of Neuroscience, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, New York, United States of America.
Elaine FuchsHoward Hughes Medical Institute, Laboratory of Mammalian Cell Biology & Development, The Rockefeller University, New York, New York, United States of America.
Deyou ZhengDepartment of Genetics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, New York, United States of America; Department of Neuroscience, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, New York, United States of America; The Saul R. Korey Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, New York, United States of America.
Albert Einstein College of Medicine · USNational Heart Lung and Blood Institute · USHoward Hughes Medical Institute · USRockefeller University · US

Funding

Genome-wide mapping of histone modificationsZIAHL005801 · NHLBI · NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE · PI ZHAO, KEJI · 2009 to 2025
$24.0M
VITAMIN A AND KERATINIZATION IN HUMAN EPITHELIAL CELLSR01AR031737 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI ELAINE FUCHS · 1986 to 2026
$16.6M
Epigenetic Regulation of T cell differentiationZIAHL006030 · NHLBI · NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE · PI ZHAO, KEJI · 2009 to 2025
$15.3M
Monoallelic expression in neurons derived from induced pluripotent stem cellsR01MH099427 · NIMH · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, INC · PI LACHMAN, HERBERT M · 2013 to 2017
$2.1M
Molecular analysis of bipolar and schizophrenia candidate genesR01MH073164 · NIMH · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI LACHMAN, HERBERT M · 2006 to 2012
$1.6M
Novel regulatory network involving non-coding role of an ASD candidate gene PTENR21MH099452 · NIMH · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI ZHENG, DEYOU · 2012 to 2013
$449k
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR031737NIAMS NIH HHS R01-AR31737NIMH NIH HHS MH073164NIMH NIH HHS MH099452NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH073164NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH099427NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH099452
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent studies have shown that the transcriptional functions of REST are much broader than repressing neuronal genes in non-neuronal systems. Whether REST occupies similar chromatin regions in different cell types and how it interacts with other transcriptional regulators to execute its functions in a context-dependent manner has not been adequately investigated. We have applied ChIP-seq analysis to identify the REST cistrome in human CD4+ T cells and compared it with published data from 15 other cell types. We found that REST cistromes were distinct among cell types, with REST binding to several tumor suppressors specifically in cancer cells, whereas 7% of the REST peaks in non-neuronal cells were ubiquitously called and <25% were identified for ≥ 5 cell types. Nevertheless, using a quantitative metric directly comparing raw ChIP-seq signals, we found the majority (∼80%) was shared by ≥ 2 cell types. Integration with RNA-seq data showed that REST binding was generally correlated with low gene expression. Close examination revealed that multiple contexts were correlated with reduced expression of REST targets, e.g., the presence of a cognate RE1 motif and cellular specificity of REST binding. These contexts were shown to play a role in differential corepressor recruitment. Furthermore, transcriptional outcome was highly influenced by REST cofactors, e.g., SIN3 and EZH2 co-occupancy marked higher and lower expression of REST targets, respectively. Unexpectedly, the REST cistrome in differentiated neurons exhibited unique features not observed in non-neuronal cells, e.g., the lack of RE1 motifs and an association with active gene expression. Finally, our analysis demonstrated how REST could differentially regulate a transcription network constituted of miRNAs, REST complex and neuronal factors. Overall, our findings of contexts playing critical roles in REST occupancy and regulatory outcome provide insights into the molecular interactions underlying REST's diverse functions, and point to novel roles of REST in differentiated neurons.

Indexed as

AnimalsCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCell LineChromatin ImmunoprecipitationGene Expression RegulationGene SilencingGenomicsHistonesHumansMiceMicroRNAsNeuronsRE1-Silencing Transcription FactorRepressor ProteinsHistonesMicroRNAsRE1-Silencing Transcription FactorRepressor Proteins

Identifiers

PMID24922058
PMCPMC4055426
OpenAlexW2149656211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.