Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24922051›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2014

Negative example selection for protein function prediction: the NoGO database.

Noah Youngs, Duncan Penfold-Brown, Richard Bonneau, Dennis Shasha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Defining the extent of gene function using ROC curvature.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. A roadmap for metagenomic enzyme discovery.Natural product reports · 2021
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Noah YoungsDepartment of Computer Science, New York University, New York, New York, United States of America.
Duncan Penfold-BrownSocial Media and Political Participation Lab, New York University, New York, New York, United States of America.
Richard BonneauDepartment of Computer Science, New York University, New York, New York, United States of America; Department of Biology, New York University, New York, New York, United States of America; Center for Genomics and Systems Biology, Department of Biology, New York University, New York, New York, United States of America.
Dennis ShashaDepartment of Computer Science, New York University, New York, New York, United States of America; Center for Genomics and Systems Biology, Department of Biology, New York University, New York, New York, United States of America.

Funding

Nanomedicine development center for mechanobiologyPN2EY016586 · NEI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI DUSTIN, MICHAEL LORAN · 2005 to 2014
$23.0M
TRANS-NETWORK PROJECTSU54CA143907 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI HILLIS, WILLIAM DANIEL · 2009 to 2013
$15.2M
Elucidation of the transcriptional network underlying the Th17 lineage program.RC4AI092765 · NIAID · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI BONNEAU, RICHARD A, LITTMAN, DAN · 2010 to 2013
$4.8M
REGULATION OF AMINO ACID BIOSYNTHESIS GENES IN PLANTSR01GM032877 · NIGMS · ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY · PI CORUZZI, GLORIA · 1985 to 2012
$4.8M
Role of ROR??t in the transcriptional regulatory network underlying Th17 lineageRC1AI087266 · NIAID · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI LITTMAN, DAN · 2010 to 2010
$495k
Center for Mechanotransduction and Nanomedicine. (RMI)PN1EY016586 · NEI · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI SHEETZ, MICHAEL PATRICK · 2004 to 2004
$81k
NCI NIH HHS IU54CA143907-01NCI NIH HHS U54 CA143907NEI NIH HHS EY016586-06NEI NIH HHS PN1 EY016586NEI NIH HHS PN2 EY016586NEI NIH HHS PN2-EY016586NIAID NIH HHS RC1 AI087266NIAID NIH HHS RC1- AI087266NIAID NIH HHS RC4 AI092765NIAID NIH HHS RC4-AI092765NIGMS NIH HHS GM 32877-21/22NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM032877
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Negative examples - genes that are known not to carry out a given protein function - are rarely recorded in genome and proteome annotation databases, such as the Gene Ontology database. Negative examples are required, however, for several of the most powerful machine learning methods for integrative protein function prediction. Most protein function prediction efforts have relied on a variety of heuristics for the choice of negative examples. Determining the accuracy of methods for negative example prediction is itself a non-trivial task, given that the Open World Assumption as applied to gene annotations rules out many traditional validation metrics. We present a rigorous comparison of these heuristics, utilizing a temporal holdout, and a novel evaluation strategy for negative examples. We add to this comparison several algorithms adapted from Positive-Unlabeled learning scenarios in text-classification, which are the current state of the art methods for generating negative examples in low-density annotation contexts. Lastly, we present two novel algorithms of our own construction, one based on empirical conditional probability, and the other using topic modeling applied to genes and annotations. We demonstrate that our algorithms achieve significantly fewer incorrect negative example predictions than the current state of the art, using multiple benchmarks covering multiple organisms. Our methods may be applied to generate negative examples for any type of method that deals with protein function, and to this end we provide a database of negative examples in several well-studied organisms, for general use (The NoGO database, available at: bonneaulab.bio.nyu.edu/nogo.html).

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDatabases, GeneticGene OntologyAnimalsArabidopsis ProteinsArtificial IntelligenceComputational BiologyGenomeHumansMiceMolecular Sequence AnnotationProteinsProteomeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsArabidopsis ProteinsProteinsProteomeSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins

Identifiers

PMID24922051
PMCPMC4055410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.