Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24921649›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2014

Augmenting microarray data with literature-based knowledge to enhance gene regulatory network inference.

Guocai Chen, Michael J Cairelli, Halil Kilicoglu, Dongwook Shin, Thomas C Rindflesch

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. SPONGE: simple prior omics network GEnerator.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Drug repurposing for COVID-19 via knowledge graph completion.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Restructured GEO: restructuring Gene Expression Omnibus metadata for genome dynamics analysis.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. KPP: KEGG Pathway Painter.BMC systems biology · 2015
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Guocai ChenLister Hill National Center for Biomedical Communications, National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
Michael J CairelliLister Hill National Center for Biomedical Communications, National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
Halil KilicogluLister Hill National Center for Biomedical Communications, National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
Dongwook ShinLister Hill National Center for Biomedical Communications, National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
Thomas C RindfleschLister Hill National Center for Biomedical Communications, National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
National Center for Biotechnology Information · US

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene regulatory networks are a crucial aspect of systems biology in describing molecular mechanisms of the cell. Various computational models rely on random gene selection to infer such networks from microarray data. While incorporation of prior knowledge into data analysis has been deemed important, in practice, it has generally been limited to referencing genes in probe sets and using curated knowledge bases. We investigate the impact of augmenting microarray data with semantic relations automatically extracted from the literature, with the view that relations encoding gene/protein interactions eliminate the need for random selection of components in non-exhaustive approaches, producing a more accurate model of cellular behavior. A genetic algorithm is then used to optimize the strength of interactions using microarray data and an artificial neural network fitness function. The result is a directed and weighted network providing the individual contribution of each gene to its target. For testing, we used invasive ductile carcinoma of the breast to query the literature and a microarray set containing gene expression changes in these cells over several time points. Our model demonstrates significantly better fitness than the state-of-the-art model, which relies on an initial random selection of genes. Comparison to the component pathways of the KEGG Pathways in Cancer map reveals that the resulting networks contain both known and novel relationships. The p53 pathway results were manually validated in the literature. 60% of non-KEGG relationships were supported (74% for highly weighted interactions). The method was then applied to yeast data and our model again outperformed the comparison model. Our results demonstrate the advantage of combining gene interactions extracted from the literature in the form of semantic relations with microarray analysis in generating contribution-weighted gene regulatory networks. This methodology can make a significant contribution to understanding the complex interactions involved in cellular behavior and molecular physiology.

Indexed as

Gene Regulatory NetworksKnowledge BasesComputational BiologyDatabases, FactualData MiningGene Expression ProfilingOligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis

Identifiers

PMID24921649
PMCPMC4055569
OpenAlexW2048677619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.