ArticlePloS one2014
CellFIT: a cellular force-inference toolkit using curvilinear cell boundaries.
Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
62 citing papers in PubMed.
- Stress Inference in Retinal Pigment Epithelium in C57BL/6J Mouse.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
- Protocol for inferring mechanical stresses in tissues using ForSys, an open-source Python tool.STAR protocols · 2026Article
- Whole tissue imaging of cellular boundaries at sub-micron resolutions for deep learning cell segmentation: Applications in the analysis of epithelial bending of ectoderm.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2026Article
- A large-scale balloon model of confluent cells validates stress inference from geometry.npj biological physics and mechanics · 2026Article
- Article
- Apical size reduction by macropinocytosis alleviates tissue crowding.Nature communications · 2025Article
- A computational pipeline for spatial mechano-transcriptomics.Nature methods · 2025Article
- Cell extrusion drives neural crest cell delamination.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Inferring active and passive mechanical drivers of epithelial convergent extension.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Planar polarized force propagation integrates cell behavior with tissue shaping during convergent extension.Current biology : CB · 2025Article
- Apico-basal intercalations enable the integrity of curved epithelia.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Article
- Peeking into the future: inferring mechanics in dynamical tissues.Biochemical Society transactions · 2024Review
- Image-based force inference by biomechanical simulation.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Spectral approaches to stress relaxation in epithelial monolayers.Proceedings. Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2024Article
- Cell extrusion - a novel mechanism driving neural crest cell delamination.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Embryo mechanics cartography: inference of 3D force atlases from fluorescence microscopy.Nature methods · 2023Article
- Mechanics of cell-cell junctions.Biophysical journal · 2023Article
- Engineering tools for quantifying and manipulating forces in epithelia.Biophysics reviews · 2023Review
- Cell shape characterization, alignment, and comparison using FlowShape.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- Surface-tension-induced budding drives alveologenesis in human mammary gland organoids.Nature physics · 2021Article
2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mechanical forces play a key role in a wide range of biological processes, from embryogenesis to cancer metastasis, and there is considerable interest in the intuitive question, "Can cellular forces be inferred from cell shapes?" Although several groups have posited affirmative answers to this stimulating question, nagging issues remained regarding equation structure, solution uniqueness and noise sensitivity. Here we show that the mechanical and mathematical factors behind these issues can be resolved by using curved cell edges rather than straight ones. We present a new package of force-inference equations and assessment tools and denote this new package CellFIT, the Cellular Force Inference Toolkit. In this approach, cells in an image are segmented and equilibrium equations are constructed for each triple junction based solely on edge tensions and the limiting angles at which edges approach each junction. The resulting system of tension equations is generally overdetermined. As a result, solutions can be obtained even when a modest number of edges need to be removed from the analysis due to short length, poor definition, image clarity or other factors. Solving these equations yields a set of relative edge tensions whose scaling must be determined from data external to the image. In cases where intracellular pressures are also of interest, Laplace equations are constructed to relate the edge tensions, curvatures and cellular pressure differences. That system is also generally overdetermined and its solution yields a set of pressures whose offset requires reference to the surrounding medium, an open wound, or information external to the image. We show that condition numbers, residual analyses and standard errors can provide confidence information about the inferred forces and pressures. Application of CellFIT to several live and fixed biological tissues reveals considerable force variability within a cell population, significant differences between populations and elevated tensions along heterotypic boundaries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.