Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24920806›Full record

ArticleJournal of virology2014

A novel mode of poxvirus superinfection exclusion that prevents fusion of the lipid bilayers of viral and cellular membranes.

Jason P Laliberte, Bernard Moss

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of virology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Virological and Immunological Outcomes of Coinfections.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2018
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jason P LaliberteLaboratory of Viral Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Bernard MossLaboratory of Viral Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA bmoss@mail.nih.gov.
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases · USNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Poxvirus EntryZIAAI000539 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI MOSS, BERNARD · 2009 to 2016
$5.6M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledSuperinfection exclusion is a widespread phenomenon that prevents secondary infections by closely related viruses. The vaccinia virus A56 and K2 proteins in the cell membrane can prevent superinfection by interacting with the entry-fusion complex of subsequent viruses. Here, we described another form of exclusion that is established earlier in infection and does not require the A56 or K2 protein. Cells infected with one or more infectious virions excluded hundreds of superinfecting vaccinia virus particles. A related orthopoxvirus, but neither a flavivirus nor a rhabdovirus, was also excluded, indicating selectivity. Although superinfecting vaccinia virus bound to cells, infection was inhibited at the membrane fusion step, thereby preventing core entry into the cytoplasm and early gene expression. In contrast, A56/K2 protein-mediated exclusion occurred subsequent to membrane fusion. Induction of resistance to superinfection depended on viral RNA and protein synthesis by the primary virus but did not require DNA replication. Although superinfection resistance correlated with virus-induced changes in the cytoskeleton, studies with mutant vaccinia viruses indicated that the cytoskeletal changes were not necessary for resistance to superinfection. Interferon-inducible transmembrane proteins, which can inhibit membrane fusion in other viral systems, did not prevent vaccinia virus membrane fusion, suggesting that these interferon-inducible proteins are not involved in superinfection exclusion. While the mechanism remains to be determined, the early establishment of superinfection exclusion may provide a "winner-take-all" reward to the first poxvirus particles that successfully initiate infection and prevent the entry and genome reproduction of defective or less fit particles. IMPORTANCE: The replication of a virus usually follows a defined sequence of events: attachment, entry into the cytoplasm or nucleus, gene expression, genome replication, assembly of infectious particles, and spread to other cells. Although multiple virus particles may enter a cell at the same time, mechanisms exist to prevent infection by subsequent viruses. The latter phenomenon, known as superinfection exclusion, can occur by a variety of mechanisms that are not well understood. We showed that superinfection by vaccinia virus was prevented at the membrane fusion step, which closely followed virion attachment. Thus, neither gene expression nor genome replication of the superinfecting virus occurred. Expression of early proteins by the primary virus was necessary and sufficient to induce the superinfection-resistant state. Superinfection exclusion may be beneficial to vaccinia virus by selecting particles that can infect cells rapidly, excluding defective particles and synchronizing the replication cycle.

Indexed as

Membrane FusionViral InterferenceVirus InternalizationAnimalsCell LineFlavivirusHumansLipid BilayersOrthopoxvirusPoxviridaeSuperinfectionVaccinia virusLipid Bilayers

Identifiers

PMID24920806
PMCPMC4136360
OpenAlexW2171998379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.