ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2014
An unusually powerful mode of low-frequency sound interference due to defective hair bundles of the auditory outer hair cells.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Inner Ear Gene Therapies Take Off: Current Promises and Future Challenges.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Review
- Transcriptomic Analyses of Inner Ear Sensory Epithelia in Zebrafish.Anatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007) · 2020Article
- Cochlear compound action potentials from high-level tone bursts originate from wide cochlear regions that are offset toward the most sensitive cochlear region.Journal of neurophysiology · 2019Article
- Next Generation Sequencing and Animal Models RevealFrontiers in genetics · 2019Article
- Clarin-1 gene transfer rescues auditory synaptopathy in model of Usher syndrome.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2018Article
- Transient Abnormalities in Masking Tuning Curve in Early Progressive Hearing Loss Mouse Model.BioMed research international · 2018Article
- CIB2, defective in isolated deafness, is key for auditory hair cell mechanotransduction and survival.EMBO molecular medicine · 2017Article
- The BEACH protein LRBA is required for hair bundle maintenance in cochlear hair cells and for hearing.EMBO reports · 2017Article
- Controllable Activation of Nanoscale Dynamics in a Disordered Protein Alters Binding Kinetics.Journal of molecular biology · 2017Article
- NHERF1/EBP50 Suppresses Wnt-β-Catenin Pathway-Driven Intestinal Neoplasia.Neoplasia (New York, N.Y.) · 2016Article
- NHERF1/EBP50 and NF2 as diagnostic markers for choroid plexus tumors.Acta neuropathologica communications · 2016Article
- NHERF1/EBP50 is an organizer of polarity structures and a diagnostic marker in ependymoma.Acta neuropathologica communications · 2015Article
- Genetics of auditory mechano-electrical transduction.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2015Review
- Developmental regulation of planar cell polarity and hair-bundle morphogenesis in auditory hair cells: lessons from human and mouse genetics.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Developmental biologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A detrimental perceptive consequence of damaged auditory sensory hair cells consists in a pronounced masking effect exerted by low-frequency sounds, thought to occur when auditory threshold elevation substantially exceeds 40 dB. Here, we identified the submembrane scaffold protein Nherf1 as a hair-bundle component of the differentiating outer hair cells (OHCs). Nherf1(-/-) mice displayed OHC hair-bundle shape anomalies in the mid and basal cochlea, normally tuned to mid- and high-frequency tones, and mild (22-35 dB) hearing-threshold elevations restricted to midhigh sound frequencies. This mild decrease in hearing sensitivity was, however, discordant with almost nonresponding OHCs at the cochlear base as assessed by distortion-product otoacoustic emissions and cochlear microphonic potentials. Moreover, unlike wild-type mice, responses of Nherf1(-/-) mice to high-frequency (20-40 kHz) test tones were not masked by tones of neighboring frequencies. Instead, efficient maskers were characterized by their frequencies up to two octaves below the probe-tone frequency, unusually low intensities up to 25 dB below probe-tone level, and growth-of-masker slope (2.2 dB/dB) reflecting their compressive amplification. Together, these properties do not fit the current acknowledged features of a hypersensitivity of the basal cochlea to lower frequencies, but rather suggest a previously unidentified mechanism. Low-frequency maskers, we propose, may interact within the unaffected cochlear apical region with midhigh frequency sounds propagated there via a mode possibly using the persistent contact of misshaped OHC hair bundles with the tectorial membrane. Our findings thus reveal a source of misleading interpretations of hearing thresholds and of hypervulnerability to low-frequency sound interference.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.