Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24920442›Full record

ReviewCognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience2014

Mechanisms of motivation-cognition interaction: challenges and opportunities.

Todd S Braver, Marie K Krug, Kimberly S Chiew, Wouter Kool, J Andrew Westbrook, Nathan J Clement, R Alison Adcock, Deanna M Barch, Matthew M Botvinick, Charles S Carver and 14 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 143 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
143citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

143 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Goal orientation shifts attentional focus and impairs reward-motivated memory.Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.) · 2025
    Article
  20. Article

83 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Todd S BraverDepartment of Psychology, Washington University in St. Louis, CB1125, One Brookings Drive, St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA, tbraver@artsci.wustl.edu.
Marie K Krug
Kimberly S Chiew
Wouter Kool
J Andrew Westbrook
Nathan J Clement
R Alison Adcock
Deanna M Barch
Matthew M Botvinick
Charles S Carver
Roshan Cools
Ruud Custers
Anthony Dickinson
Carol S Dweck
Ayelet Fishbach
Peter M Gollwitzer
Thomas M Hess
Derek M Isaacowitz
Mara Mather
Kou Murayama
Luiz Pessoa
Gregory R Samanez-Larkin
Leah H Somerville
MOMCAI group

Funding

Dual Mechanisms of Cognitive ControlR37MH066078 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BRAVER, TODD S · 2013 to 2022
$7.2M
MECHANISMS OF MOTIVATION, COGNITION & AGING INTERACTIONS: SMALL-GROUP MEETINGR13AG042291 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BRAVER, TODD S · 2012 to 2012
$40k
NIA NIH HHS R13 AG042291NIMH NIH HHS R37 MH066078
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent years have seen a rejuvenation of interest in studies of motivation-cognition interactions arising from many different areas of psychology and neuroscience. The present issue of Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience provides a sampling of some of the latest research from a number of these different areas. In this introductory article, we provide an overview of the current state of the field, in terms of key research developments and candidate neural mechanisms receiving focused investigation as potential sources of motivation-cognition interaction. However, our primary goal is conceptual: to highlight the distinct perspectives taken by different research areas, in terms of how motivation is defined, the relevant dimensions and dissociations that are emphasized, and the theoretical questions being targeted. Together, these distinctions present both challenges and opportunities for efforts aiming toward a more unified and cross-disciplinary approach. We identify a set of pressing research questions calling for this sort of cross-disciplinary approach, with the explicit goal of encouraging integrative and collaborative investigations directed toward them.

Indexed as

AnimalsCognitionHumansMotivationNeuropsychological Tests

Identifiers

PMID24920442
PMCPMC4986920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.