Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24919951›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2014

Nicastrin and Notch4 drive endocrine therapy resistance and epithelial to mesenchymal transition in MCF7 breast cancer cells.

Ylenia Lombardo, Monica Faronato, Aleksandra Filipovic, Valentina Vircillo, Luca Magnani, R Charles Coombes

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The interplay between microRNAs and Twist1 transcription factor: a systematic review.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2016
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ylenia Lombardo
Monica Faronato
Aleksandra Filipovic
Valentina Vircillo
Luca Magnani
R Charles Coombes
Hammersmith Hospital · GBImperial College London · GBUniversity of Calabria · IT

Funding

Cancer Research UK 12011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionResistance to anti-estrogen therapies is a major cause of disease relapse and mortality in estrogen receptor alpha (ERα)-positive breast cancers. Tamoxifen or estrogen withdrawal increases the dependence of breast cancer cells on Notch signalling. Here, we investigated the contribution of Nicastrin and Notch signalling in endocrine-resistant breast cancer cells.

methodsWe used two models of endocrine therapies resistant (ETR) breast cancer: tamoxifen-resistant (TamR) and long-term estrogen-deprived (LTED) MCF7 cells. We evaluated the migratory and invasive capacity of these cells by Transwell assays. Expression of epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) regulators as well as Notch receptors and targets were evaluated by real-time PCR and western blot analysis. Moreover, we tested in vitro anti-Nicastrin monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and gamma secretase inhibitors (GSIs) as potential EMT reversal therapeutic agents. Finally, we generated stable Nicastrin overexpessing MCF7 cells and evaluated their EMT features and response to tamoxifen.

resultsWe found that ETR cells acquired an epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) phenotype and displayed increased levels of Nicastrin and Notch targets. Interestingly, we detected higher level of Notch4 but lower levels of Notch1 and Notch2 suggesting a switch to signalling through different Notch receptors after acquisition of resistance. Anti-Nicastrin monoclonal antibodies and the GSI PF03084014 were effective in blocking the Nicastrin/Notch4 axis and partially inhibiting the EMT process. As a result of this, cell migration and invasion were attenuated and the stem cell-like population was significantly reduced. Genetic silencing of Nicastrin and Notch4 led to equivalent effects. Finally, stable overexpression of Nicastrin was sufficient to make MCF7 unresponsive to tamoxifen by Notch4 activation.

conclusionsETR cells express high levels of Nicastrin and Notch4, whose activation ultimately drives invasive behaviour. Anti-Nicastrin mAbs and GSI PF03084014 attenuate expression of EMT molecules reducing cellular invasiveness. Nicastrin overexpression per se induces tamoxifen resistance linked to acquisition of EMT phenotype. Our finding suggest that targeting Nicastrin and/or Notch4 warrants further clinical evaluation as valid therapeutic strategies in endocrine-resistant breast cancer.

Indexed as

Amyloid Precursor Protein SecretasesAntibodies, MonoclonalAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalBreast NeoplasmsCD24 AntigenCell MovementDrug Resistance, NeoplasmEpithelial-Mesenchymal TransitionEstrogen Receptor alphaFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansHyaluronan ReceptorsMCF-7 CellsMembrane GlycoproteinsNeoplasm InvasivenessAmyloid Precursor Protein SecretasesAntibodies, MonoclonalAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalCD24 AntigenCD24 protein, humanCD44 protein, humanESR1 protein, humanEstrogen Receptor alphaHyaluronan ReceptorsMembrane Glycoproteinsnicastrin proteinnirogacestatNOTCH1 protein, humanNOTCH2 protein, humanNOTCH4 protein, humanProto-Oncogene ProteinsReceptor, Notch1Receptor, Notch2Receptor, Notch4Receptors, NotchRNA, Small InterferingSelective Estrogen Receptor ModulatorsTamoxifenTetrahydronaphthalenesValine

Identifiers

PMID24919951
PMCPMC4095694
OpenAlexW2102296773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.