Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24919790›Full record

ReviewCNS drugs2014

Presynaptic dopaminergic function: implications for understanding treatment response in psychosis.

I Bonoldi, O D Howes

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in CNS drugs, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

I BonoldiDepartment of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College of London, De Crespigny Park 16, London, SE5 8AF, UK, ilaria.bonoldi@kcl.ac.uk.
O D Howes

Funding

Department of HealthMedical Research Council G0700995Medical Research Council MC-A656-5QD30Medical Research Council MC_U120097115Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

All current antipsychotic drugs block dopamine (DA) receptors, but the nature of the DA dysfunction in schizophrenia has not been clear. However, consistent evidence now shows that presynaptic dopaminergic function is altered in schizophrenia, specifically in terms of increased DA synthesis capacity, baseline synaptic DA levels, and DA release. Furthermore, presynaptic dopaminergic function is already elevated in prodromal patients who later developed the disorder. Currently available antipsychotics act on postsynaptic receptors, not targeting presynaptic DA abnormalities. This has implications for understanding response and developing new treatments. The lack of normalization of the abnormal presynaptic function could explain why discontinuation is likely to lead to relapse, because the major dopaminergic function persists, meaning that once treatment stops there is nothing to oppose the dysregulated dopamine function reinstating symptoms. Furthermore, it suggests that drugs that target presynaptic dopaminergic function may constitute new treatment possibilities for schizophrenic patients, in particular, for those in whom antipsychotics are poorly effective. In addition, the longitudinal changes with the onset of psychosis indicate the potential to target a defined dynamic neurochemical abnormality to prevent the onset of psychosis.

Indexed as

Antipsychotic AgentsDopamineDrug DesignHumansMolecular Targeted TherapyPresynaptic TerminalsPsychotic DisordersReceptors, DopamineSchizophreniaAntipsychotic AgentsDopamineReceptors, Dopamine

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.