ArticleDatabase : the journal of biological databases and curation2014
Web services-based text-mining demonstrates broad impacts for interoperability and process simplification.
Article in Database : the journal of biological databases and curation, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating AI-powered text mining from PubTator into the manual curation workflow at the Comparative Toxicogenomics Database.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2025Article
- Article
- Comparative Toxicogenomics Database (CTD): update 2021.Nucleic acids research · 2021Article
- Next generation community assessment of biomedical entity recognition web servers: metrics, performance, interoperability aspects of BeCalm.Journal of cheminformatics · 2019Article
- Navigating the disease landscape: knowledge representations for contextualizing molecular signatures.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2019Review
- The Comparative Toxicogenomics Database: update 2017.Nucleic acids research · 2017Article
- Beyond accuracy: creating interoperable and scalable text-mining web services.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2016Article
- BioCreative V CDR task corpus: a resource for chemical disease relation extraction.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2016Article
- Community challenges in biomedical text mining over 10 years: success, failure and the future.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2016Review
- Assessing the state of the art in biomedical relation extraction: overview of the BioCreative V chemical-disease relation (CDR) task.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2016Article
- CD-REST: a system for extracting chemical-induced disease relation in literature.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2016Article
- Chemical-induced disease relation extraction with various linguistic features.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2016Article
- Overview of the interactive task in BioCreative V.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2016Article
- Pressing needs of biomedical text mining in biocuration and beyond: opportunities and challenges.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2016Article
- The Comparative Toxicogenomics Database's 10th year anniversary: update 2015.Nucleic acids research · 2015Article
- BioC interoperability track overview.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2014Review
- Processing biological literature with customizable Web services supporting interoperable formats.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Critical Assessment of Information Extraction systems in Biology (BioCreAtIvE) challenge evaluation tasks collectively represent a community-wide effort to evaluate a variety of text-mining and information extraction systems applied to the biological domain. The BioCreative IV Workshop included five independent subject areas, including Track 3, which focused on named-entity recognition (NER) for the Comparative Toxicogenomics Database (CTD; http://ctdbase.org). Previously, CTD had organized document ranking and NER-related tasks for the BioCreative Workshop 2012; a key finding of that effort was that interoperability and integration complexity were major impediments to the direct application of the systems to CTD's text-mining pipeline. This underscored a prevailing problem with software integration efforts. Major interoperability-related issues included lack of process modularity, operating system incompatibility, tool configuration complexity and lack of standardization of high-level inter-process communications. One approach to potentially mitigate interoperability and general integration issues is the use of Web services to abstract implementation details; rather than integrating NER tools directly, HTTP-based calls from CTD's asynchronous, batch-oriented text-mining pipeline could be made to remote NER Web services for recognition of specific biological terms using BioC (an emerging family of XML formats) for inter-process communications. To test this concept, participating groups developed Representational State Transfer /BioC-compliant Web services tailored to CTD's NER requirements. Participants were provided with a comprehensive set of training materials. CTD evaluated results obtained from the remote Web service-based URLs against a test data set of 510 manually curated scientific articles. Twelve groups participated in the challenge. Recall, precision, balanced F-scores and response times were calculated. Top balanced F-scores for gene, chemical and disease NER were 61, 74 and 51%, respectively. Response times ranged from fractions-of-a-second to over a minute per article. We present a description of the challenge and summary of results, demonstrating how curation groups can effectively use interoperable NER technologies to simplify text-mining pipeline implementation. Database URL: http://ctdbase.org/
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.